Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.06 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
6
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 01, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code paint metal in accordance with dept. regulation heat riser pipe in the bathroom located at apt 1, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Hazardous
49
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 01, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... less than 15 sq at all walls and ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 1, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
11
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 29, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 1, 1st story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
H
381 Hooper LLC
2.3(5)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•71 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
K
Knoll & Weinberg Realty Corp.
2.4(20)
Corporate Owner•
21 Properties•514 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 16
J
Julian Bana
2.3(5)
Site Manager•
1 Property•32 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
D
David Tennenbaum
2.3(5)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•63 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
1.62 stars
just now
Nice location - Stabilized
Former Tenant
Pros:
Rent Stabilized, good location
Cons:
Owner does not care about tenants. Repairs are never made.
3.12 stars
4 months ago
Convenient Location - that’s about it
Former Tenant
Pros:
I have an updated unit, so I don’t have any complaints about my apartment: - Good water pressure - Can be Hell hot in the winter - Super up until now has been pretty good and keeps people who don’t live in the building and cause trouble out. - Fios or Spectrum internet option
Cons:
- Getting a new super that is wildly underpaid, so I don’t expect the cleanliness to be upheld. - The heat/hot water goes out a few times every winter. - Occasional pest sighting - MGMT is quite literally impossible to grt in contact with - they are in the top 10 worst landlords in the city list (literally) - Neighboring building has a bunch of drug addicts with a friend in this one and can make a lot of noise. - Packages get stolen somewhat regularly
Advice to owner:
Answer your phone and keep your buildings clean.
2.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
The roof is gonna cave in
Former Tenant
Pros:
inexpensive, rent stabilized, gut reno'd, good location
Cons:
The super deals heroin. There are broken crack pipes in the stairwell. You can smell cigarette smoke coming in from other units, and everytime it rains there is a huge pool of water on the roof that never seems to fully go away.
Advice to owner:
fix the place up instead of slap/dash fixes
1.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Crack den outside
Former Tenant
Pros:
Heat, price, windows
Cons:
Everything, building is 60 years old, absent landlord, takes forever for things to be fixed and they break a lot
Advice to owner:
Just awful and spend money
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Not the worst
Former Tenant
Pros:
Large apartments, excellent water pressure, built 1916 or earlier & was once a beautiful building, wide staircase, great convenient location close to multiple train lines.
Cons:
Shoddy poorly done quick fix repairs done by unskilled workers, grimy rarely cleaned hallways/stairs unswept for weeks, massive long-term heroin dealer/user issues outside & inside building, abandoned building w/ homeless encampment nextdoor, constant clogged drain on roof creates lake of rain water, super never wore mask through entire pandemic including while inside tenants apartments
Advice to owner:
At the very least make someone sweep/clean hallways & stairs on regular basis.