NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
Central Harlem
/
South Harlem
/
220 West 116 Street
South Harlem

220 West 116 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10026

10 Units

•

Built in 1910

•

5 Floors

2.4(2)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    113 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 10 hours ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    1.1 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    2
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Feb 09, 2015: section 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the ceiling and all walls in the bathroom located at apt 2w, 2nd story, 1st apartment from south at west
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    4
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Apr 26, 2019: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove all encumbrances consisting of household items stored , roof bulk head at public hall stairs
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    5
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Mar 02, 2021: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair the broken or defective locking device on door at building entrance , 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    G
    Galil Management LLC
    2.6(12)
    Agent•
    12 Properties•258 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 20
    J
    Joel Goldstein
    2.2(5)
    Head Officer•
    6 Properties•105 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 5
    M
    161-171 Morningside LLC
    2.6(53)
    Corporate Owner•
    43 Properties•1549 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 156
    W
    W 116-125 Portfolio LLC
    2.2(5)
    Corporate Owner•
    6 Properties•65 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 3
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (2)

    Over 2 years ago
    It’s not terrible
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Apartments are spacious and things function well
    Cons:
    Neighbors sometimes leave a mess in the stairwell
    Advice to owner:
    Be more responsive
    Over 2 years ago
    Disgusting, Badly Maintained
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The area is ok but it’s close to Frederick Douglas, near a lot of good restaurants.
    Cons:
    The block the building is on is dirty and loud. Men sit outside the building all day and into the night. If you are a woman, be careful if you are alone.
    There are multiple maintenance issues throughout the building that have not been resolved. Mailboxes are not up to code and often do not receive mail, the lobby and stairways are disgusting, the buzzer has been broken for over three months. The main entrance once had blood throughout the hallway and it took three days for it to be cleaned. The cleanliness issue is completely unacceptable during covid.
    Advice to owner:
    Clean the building, hire another property manager to assist in maintenance requests. There are too many problems in the building for one person to handle.