212 West 109 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10025

20 Units

Built in 1910

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
187 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
3.95 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
20
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 29, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the north wall in the bathroom located at apt 2b, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Hazardous
27
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 22, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: refit upper and lower sash at the first window from west at north in the 1st room from north at east located at apt 1a, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
32
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 22, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 1a, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
J
Joshua Gotlib
2.8(65)
Head Officer
21 Properties356 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 18
N
Naftoli Leiner
1.6(4)
Site Manager
1 Property20 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
T
109th Affordable Housing LLC
2.8(65)
Corporate Owner
21 Properties354 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 19
logo
Nieuw Amsterdam Property Management
2.9(207)
Agent
207 Properties3287 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 212
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

4 months ago
Avoid at All Cost
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location. Near Columbia campus
Cons:
Rodent infested, owner do not care about maintenance, dirty, not safe, no elevator
Over 1 year ago
Don't live here
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location next to columbia and other amenities
Cons:
incredibly non transparent rental and renovation process, gave us our apartment 10 DAYS LATE, put a "sight unseen clause" despite us viewing the apartment. Washer and dryer in unit had been advertised but it was broken the whole time and they did not compensate us for it. lots of cockroaches, poor finishings, bad renovation, bad building maintenance (our doorbell was broken for a long time and they would not fix it). We had a mold infestation and the super came into our apartment and said he would just be fixing the smoke detector (that does not work) he then proceeded to paint over the mold, splashing paint over all of our bathroom belongings.
Over 1 year ago
Not worth the price
Former Tenant
Pros:
The size of apartment, in-unit washer/dryer, dishwasher
Cons:
So many roaches and mice. Rats surrounding and possibly in building. Lobby and common areas not kept in good condition. Bad paint jobs throughout building and in apartment and some with possible lead contamination. Packages opened and stolen. Apartment didn't have gas for 3 months so were left to use electric burners. Slow and unresponsive building management.
Advice to owner:
Clean up and renovate the building. Hire new building super. Actually deal with pest problems. Upgrade apartment appliances.
Over 1 year ago
Bug invested hell hole
Former Tenant
Pros:
It hasn't collapsed while I was inside
Cons:
Rats everywhere
Bugs everywhere
Dogs piss all over inside of building
Useless super
Unresponsive management
Advice to owner:
Sell the building to someone that isn't clueless.