Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.68 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Sep 11, 2024: § 53, 187, 231 m/d law and department rules and regulations. provide a shoe properly secured to bottom of string of dropladder welded shoe of drop ladder at fire escape at building front at fire escape
Show all
Hazardous
8
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 17, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling in the bathroom located at cellar apt 1, 1st cellar apt from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 16, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at cellar apt baseme, 1st cellar apt from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Akiva Shoob
2.4(2)
Agent•
1 Property•16 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
C
Cra West 182nd Street LLC
2.4(3)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•43 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
D
Dg 399 Chauncey LLC
3.2(59)
Corporate Owner•
65 Properties•568 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 30
M
Mordechai Koslowitz
2.5(6)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•20 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
2.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Falling apart
Former Tenant
Pros:
Affordable, good area, great access to stuff
Cons:
The building is falling apart and the owners dont repair it properly
Advice to owner:
Please be on too of the building maintenance. Get a better superintendent
2.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Decent building but not worth the stress
Former Tenant
Pros:
Heat and hot water included, quiet and respectful neighbors, and building very close to the A & 1 trains
Cons:
Rude and unhelpful live-in super, roaches and mice with terrible pest control options, little to no ventilation within the apartment, and extremely disruptive construction in the building with no warning (ie loud banging/drilling or turning off the building’s water for hours out of nowhere). Also, the landlords could not care less about what struggles their tenants are facing, which became very apparent during the pandemic.
Advice to owner:
If you want your tenants to believe you actually care, stop ignoring calls and emails whenever you feel like it. Your covid response was also a huge slap in the face. Offering a monthly money raffle to those who have already paid that month’s rent is not helpful. Why not extend that sort of aid to tenants who have been negatively affected by covid and are actually struggling to pay rent? It makes absolutely no sense to give money to people who already have the means to pay.