306 West 142 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10030

72 Units

Built in 2015

7 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
61 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.31 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
10
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
May 31, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 3e, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Hazardous
5
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 14, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... appox. 2 sqft at mechanical vent at ceiling in the foyer located at apt 4c, 4th story, 2nd apartment from east at south original violation 16879044 issued 14-apr-24 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 02, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 2e, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
4
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 15, 2023: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Maria Lordache
2.8(5)
Site Manager
1 Property72 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
J
Jeremy Markowitz
3.2(12)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties108 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
J
Jeremy Markowitz
2.8(5)
Agent
Head Officer
1 Property72 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
R
Residential Industries I LLC
3.2(12)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties108 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (5)

6 months ago
Outdated Harlem Luxury
Former Tenant
Pros:
Laundry in basement
Cons:
Super takes long to respond, stolen packages
Advice to owner:
Get a package room for tenants/ delivery workers
Over 1 year ago
Not too bad
Former Tenant
Pros:
Big, bright apartments
New appliances
Deep bathtubs in bathrooms
Trash chutes on every floor with recycling
No pests!!!
Cons:
As much as the pros are nice, there’s a con to them too.
The appliances are new, but cheap. The fridge had cracked shelving when I moved in and still hadn’t been fixed. My microwave crapped out on me and was never replaced. Trash chutes are convenient on every floor, but it can get overflowed and messy.
Since switching management and supers, nothing ever gets fixed. The halls used to be cleaned weekly, and now it seems like almost never. Packages are almost always stolen from the lobby too.
Advice to owner:
Please be more responsive to tenants. And clean the hallways!
Over 2 years ago
Dishonest/shady landlord and maintenance
Former Tenant
Pros:
When they hired a competent super, the building was well maintained for the most part during the second year of my lease.
Cons:
I lived here for two years and this was my first apartment in NYC. When I moved in the maintenance was abysmal and non-existent; my apartment was not turned over at all. The walls weren’t painted, the unit was filthy and there was cat hair and cat pee stains from the previous tenant. Things in the unit were always breaking and falling apart despite being a “luxury” building. My biggest regret was not documenting this at the beginning of the lease. Fast forward two years and I’m moving out and the super and his boss decides that I have “damaged” the apartment, specifically the floors. I told them the floors looked exactly like that on the day that I moved in. Unfortunately I had no documentation to show proof. I was initially given permission by the manager to hire my own licensed contractor to make the “repairs” but at the last minute they hired their own contractor behind my back and made the “repairs” before I could. A lot of miscommunication between management and maintenance. Their contractor charged an absurd amount that was four times more than what my contractor was going to charge. I unfortunately signed up for the bogus Rhino policy instead of giving a security deposit (which I also regret) so they filed a claim and got paid by Rhino then I had to pay Rhino back. Firstly, do not use Rhino in lieu of a security deposit. This service only benefits the landlord and gives them an opportunity to take advantage of the tenant. Secondly take photos of your unit before you move in and make them repair anything that looks off. I do believe they repaired other things in the unit that were not "damaged" with their contractor and billed me for it because they knew they would get away with it and rhino would approve the claim and pay them.
I believe that they used this opportunity to make me pay to turn over the unit for the next tenant which is a slap in the face considering they never turned the unit over for me when I moved in. Overall my experience living here wasn’t bad despite them not turning over my unit initially (which I mostly blame them for having a lazy super when I first moved in) but the experience at the end of my lease was so negative and such an eye opener it made me realize how dishonest and shady this landlord and its maintenance team are. Because of this I do not recommend living here.
Advice to owner:
Stop using Rhino policies to take advantage of tenants and make them pay for bogus damage claims. It is your responsibility to turn over units, not your tenants.
Over 2 years ago
Loud bar and heating is insane
Former Tenant
Pros:
The new super was very good about taking out the recycling when we left
Near a great station
Cons:
Loud bar causes windows to shake at night
Summer nights are impossible to sleep through with people blasting their music at night
Multiple shootings occurred in the year we stayed there, on the corner of 142 st and 8th ave
Not a ton of food options nearby
Street is always full of trash
Neighbors would constantly yell in the hallways
Took them 6 months to fix a leaky dishwasher
Non-responsive management company
Took awhile to get our deposit back
Advice to owner:
Change the management company
Over 2 years ago
New construction gone wrong
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, access to subways
Cons:
Building is riddled with problems from the start. Complaints of leaking roof from tenants on the top floor; complaints of HVAC issues; elevator is always breaking down; revolving door of supers; delivered packages go missing; front lobby doors have been vandalized several times. Promised amenities never materialized. Unresponsive owner/management, lack of urgency and communication to resolve complaints
Advice to owner:
Please see cons