A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
-- violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jan 31, 2020: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (14)
3.12 stars
1 month ago
Good Location, Poor Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Super close to train lines.
Cons:
Management is really hard to work with and rude for no reason. It will sometimes take a lot of chasing for management or the super to fix really basic things like pests. Also 90% of the building gets NO sun.
2.25 stars
2 months ago
worst landlord I've ever dealt with
Former Tenant
Pros:
As far as public transportation goes, the location is as convenient as it gets.
Cons:
Everything else. There were no functioning trash chutes. Trash was just heaped up on each floor. There was often no doorman on duty, and the "virtual doorman" didn't work. The rent increases were extortionate. They increased my rent by 50% one year, and the guy you have to deal with, Donald, won't negotiate and is one of the nastiest humans (I use the term loosely . . .) I have ever had the misfortune to deal with. They also completely, blatantly unlawfully withheld part of my security deposit when I moved out; and they were just lucky I didn't have the time to fight back. When I was originally looking at the apartment, my broker told me to ignore the bad reviews, that management handling multiple buildings will always be complained about. That was bad advice. Thurcon really was vile.
Advice to owner:
Sell the building!
4.25 stars
3 months ago
Poor pest management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Responsive management, updated appliances
Cons:
Roaches in apartment
Advice to owner:
Pest control
3.25 stars
5 months ago
Unresponsive Management, nice building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Front desk friendly, everything with them was seamless
Cons:
Aside from front desk, management has been very unhelpful and 2 months into our lease we still have not received a promised second key.
Advice to owner:
Look into staff laziness
1 stars
11 months ago
Horrible experience, stay away
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doorman is kind
Cons:
Super dirty, old, management doesn't respond to requests
3.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
Front desk people are the best
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very attentive and friendly people at the front desk Rooms can be quiet Good AC/Heat system
Cons:
Can get very hot during the winter
4.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
No Flex Zone
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great doormen, nice laundry room, nice kitchen, prime location with many train lines right downstairs. Was a good short-term rental during college.
Cons:
low levels get little light. I was in a studio flexed into a two-bedroom and it was depressing, but I imagine if it were used as a studio it would be quite pleasant (though expensive---we paid covid rent). Stole our security deposit.
4 stars
Over 1 year ago
Living in 106 Fulton
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doormen are nice, maintenance requests are responsive, heat and water was always fine
Cons:
Frequent fire alarms, THIN walls, things falling apart after a little (shower knob fell off randomly), had to pay for an AC that was supposed to be included, paint peeling
3.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
106 fulton
Former Tenant
Pros:
Sweetest Doormen and very well maintained building
Cons:
Not very responsive building management
2.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Such Wasted Potential
Former Tenant
Pros:
Unit was renovated. Large windows. Tub. Stainless steel fridge.
Cons:
Not very safe (robbery at gunpoint across the street, a tenant was accosted in front of the building and the police were called, people yelling at all hours, stabbings in Fulton station, etc.). Faulty fire alarm that’s triggered weekly calling FDNY at all times of day/night. Used to be a dorm. No gym. Must stand on a step stool to reach cabinets. Hallways are very ugly. Not much natural light. Multiple floors not completed (construction). No roof deck. Front door on occasion doesn’t shut fully. Trash is only picked up from the trash room once/week. No online rental portal - all snail mail. Don’t allow tenants to go to the corporate office or speak with anyone in person. Not sure the camera system works. Not to mention raised the entire buildings rent by 40%-70% per month.
Advice to owner:
Fix the faulty fire alarm system. Create an online payment portal (though I’m sure they keep rent payment via snail mail to ensure late fees with no consequences). Warn tenants earlier for extermination/window cleaning treatments. Allow tenants to speak with management / drop off checks in person if you refuse to utilize an online portal.
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
For a Good Time, Not a Long Time
Former Tenant
Pros:
Used to be below market rate, mostly quiet, decent superintendent, recently renovated. Utilities were very affordable.
Cons:
Basically no amenities, awful management company, poor sunlight exposure in most units, no access to garbage receptacle which causes roach problems
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
Ok apartment really bad owners
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator, laundry, super is nice.
Cons:
Really bad owners. Were not giving back deposit.
4.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
106 Fulton Street
Former Tenant
Pros:
doormen are friendly, building is clean
Cons:
water pressure could be better
3 stars
Over 3 years ago
Great location and door men, Management is not helpful
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, doormen are incredible (so fantastic!) and love the overall building
Cons:
Rent and info about utilities is only available via paper slip shoved under door? So we cannot find out how much we owe anyone if nobody is home? Also Barbara is incredibly rude and management is unresponsive
Advice to owner:
Find better/more effective ways to communicate with tenants... Particularly to stop sending them emails in all caps writing in the largest possible font in red. Also get a working front door buzzer instead of whatever janky system is currently in place.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here