117 South St,
Manhattan, NY 10038

16 Units

Built in 1873

5 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.37 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 01, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
flag
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jan 25, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the roof so that it will not leak above ceiling in the 2nd room from east located at apt 5c, 5th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
Emilio Barletta
3.4(1)
Agent
Site Manager
Head Officer
Shareholder
Officer
1 Property16 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
S
119 South Street Associates Eb LLC
3.4(1)
Owner
1 Property16 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
L
Lucia Barletta
3.4(1)
Officer
1 Property16 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
S
119 South Street Associates LLC
3.4(1)
Corporate Owner
1 Property16 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (1)

3 months ago
New Management, New Problems
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building is overall nice, with up to date/ refurbished apartments and cleanly hallways and common spaces. It’s in a beautiful and historic area, and the building also has historic roots.
Cons:
Management, management, MANAGEMENT. This building used to be owned by the sweetest Italian man and his family. I’m not sure if he sold the building to a management company or if he is using a 3rd party to take over the landlord’s duties (they literally never explained why this changed), but this new management company is the WORST. They are unresponsive, and incredibly unprofessional in the way they handle things. My old roommate moved out, and they didn’t give her security deposit back to her for 8 months, which is so beyond illegal and unacceptable. Additionally, “accounting” tried to lie and say that my new roommate didn’t pay for a specific month’s rent, when she literally did and we have the receipts that get sent to our emails, then when we challenged this they came back with a new excuse. It’s just really suspicious and at times illegal the way they handle things relating to rent and security deposits.

Whenever there is an issue, for example we went from seeing 2 cockroaches in a year and a half to suddenly seeing them throughout the building and 3 times within 2 weeks in our apartment. My roommate literally woke up with a massive cockroach CRAWLING ON HER BACK IN HER BED. We put in a maintenance request online using the appfolio system, and then they come back to us first saying that we needed to write this down on a piece of paper in the lobby. Like okay what was the point of filling out the entire request digitally? Also when I had filled the random sheet of paper out in the past, no one ever came. Then they got back to us after we repeatedly tried calling and texting and they told us that they would have someone come nearly a month later. I offered to pay to have someone come sooner if they deducted the cost out of my rent, and they just ignored me despite repeated attempts to follow up. It’s just really poorly managed, and I wish this building could go back to the days when it was managed by a small family and not this shell company that you can’t see or speak to easily.
Advice to owner:
Fire this management company if it’s 3rd party, or if this new company owns the building now: you guys absolutely suck and need to do better
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here