Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.04 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 15, 2016: section 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor missing frame at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
G
Gina Fazzalaro
4.2(151)
Head Officer•
312 Properties•27132 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 78
A
Akam Associates Inc
4.1(78)
Agent•
189 Properties•11853 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 35
T
The Bindery Condo
4.2(5)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•219 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
C
Christopher Alker
3.4(5)
Officer•
6 Properties•811 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
3 stars
Over 1 year ago
Good for an old building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Lots of architects live in building that care about its preservation
Cons:
The management company is not proactive. The security of the building has been compromised, with packages stolen and thieves gaining entry. They have installed flood lights in entryway and a package credenza but theft issues continue.
Advice to owner:
Fix security issues. Water pressure is weak for shower and bathroom. Renovation for apartment was supposed to end June and is still happening in December as construction signs are still up in lobby.
3.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Decent, but could be better for the neighborhood it's in.
Former Tenant
Pros:
(Mostly) working utilities and front door. Hot water. Decently sized in-building laundry.
Cons:
Washers/Dryers were often out of order. Poorly ventilated leading to lots of cockroaches and noise pollution. Windows were practically translucent because of the dirt.
Advice to owner:
Have maintainence check in more regularly and do more upkeep. Spray for bugs.