87 Pitt Street,Manhattan, NY 10002
21 Units
•Built in 1920
•6 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 87 Pitt Street
Lower East Side
85 Pitt Street #21
$5,336
3 beds•1 bath•Est. May 2025
Future
Lower East Side
85 Pitt Street #20
$4,158
2 beds•1 bath•Est. May 2025
Future
Lower East Side
85 Pitt Street #7
$3,927
2 beds•1 bath•Est. May 2025
Future
Lower East Side
85 Pitt Street #15
$3,638
2 beds•1 bath•Est. May 2025
Future
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
48 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.28 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
14
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 06, 2024: § 53, 187, 231 m/d law and department rules and regulations. provide a shoe properly secured to bottom of string of dropladder at east building front at fire escape, 2nd story
Show all
Hazardous
10
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 06, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code fire escape defective. adjust the dropladder so that it will slide easily in the guide rods at east building front at fire escape, 2nd story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
May 28, 2021: section 27-2005 adm code properly repair the broken or defective spring balance at upper and lower sashes at north 1 window at north wall in the 1st room from east located at apt 19, 6th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Ad Real Estate Investors Inc
3.4(32)
Agent•
15 Properties•259 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
P
85 Pitt Street, LLC
2.5(6)
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•21 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
D
Daniel Doyle
2.5(6)
Site Manager•
1 Property•21 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
A
Aaron Daniels
3.2(33)
Officer•
12 Properties•209 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (6)
2.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
No responsive Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Laundry in Building and Dish Washer
Cons:
Location; Packages Stolen; no responsive unless urgent like plumbing or water issues.
Advice to owner:
Get a more responsive management team
1.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
You deserve better
Former Tenant
Pros:
It was within walking distance of great areas although the building itself was in a terrible location.
Cons:
The building was disgusting with terrible trash management and was infested with roaches. Packages were stolen on a regular basis. I could go on forever.
Advice to owner:
Fumigate the building
3.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Worst management company
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is convenient and i like the neighborhood
Cons:
Management company is the worst. Danielle is horrible and rude and doesn’t fix anything. They pose themselves as a company but I’ve only spoken to Danielle- I’ve requested to speak with someone else and she refused.
One time i had a package stolen from the building. I saw it in the lobby on my way to work but i was running really late so i left it there. When i came back 4 hours later it was gone. I called and asked for security footage which was a whole other argument- Danielle demanded to know the exact time when the package was stolen and i told her i could only
Narrow it down to 4 hours and she was EXTREMELY difficult about it. They sent an employee to the building and i got the footage on a usb drive. There was about 10 hours of footage but the 4 hours i requested was cut out!
Also COCKROACHES
One time i had a package stolen from the building. I saw it in the lobby on my way to work but i was running really late so i left it there. When i came back 4 hours later it was gone. I called and asked for security footage which was a whole other argument- Danielle demanded to know the exact time when the package was stolen and i told her i could only
Narrow it down to 4 hours and she was EXTREMELY difficult about it. They sent an employee to the building and i got the footage on a usb drive. There was about 10 hours of footage but the 4 hours i requested was cut out!
Also COCKROACHES
Advice to owner:
Get a new, competent, management company/new staff.
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Building owners suck
Former Tenant
Pros:
Dishwasher in unit, laundry in building
Cons:
They shut off hot water a couple times throughout the year and didnt turn it on for days, no smoke alarm or carbon monoxide alarm, bad neighborhood compared to a few blocks away but they charge as if its the heart of the east village. I had to use pepper spray outside twice on aggressive neighbors. Oh and sometimes people leave dog poo in the lobby.
Advice to owner:
Be responsive
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
not worth it
Former Tenant
Pros:
The tenants are nice, the location is great.
Cons:
The management is incredibly rude. Several times they accused me of missing payments, and instead of rectifying this kindly, they responded with two-word emails. It took six weeks to get a plumber into our unit, and their emergency line for repairs always had a full inbox.
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive to tenant concerns.
2.67 stars
Over 2 years ago
Full of cockroaches
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to train, bars, restaurants
Cons:
Cockroaches, projects across the street
Advice to owner:
Fix the bugs