Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 month ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.04 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Apr 12, 2018: section 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective cracked keystone and cement stucco at 4th story windows at building front
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
H
Haymchaud Bharat
2.5(10)
Officer•
2 Properties•30 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
S
Seth Yablans
2.9(20)
Officer•
8 Properties•141 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
H
Harlen Silva
2.3(8)
Site Manager•
1 Property•22 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
A
Alex Laszlo
3(18)
Head Officer•
11 Properties•204 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (8)
2.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Could be worse
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location. The porter is nice and does a good job
Cons:
The heat is really janky. Mice inside and there are rats in the garbage area.
3 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great for college kids
Former Tenant
Pros:
I love the location: right in the middle of the LES in the middle of all the nightlife
Cons:
It’s above Speedy Romeo, the pizza shop. They have super loud parties there til all hours and they do not care. They also use the laundry machines meant for residents and they make them really gross.
Advice to owner:
Just do better.
3 stars
Over 2 years ago
63 Clinton St
Former Tenant
Pros:
It was in a great location
Cons:
Building was doing a lot of construction and was very dirty
2.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good location but a detoriating property
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location location location
Cons:
Packages getting stolen all the time
Advice to owner:
Time to invest in some security feature like cameras in the hall ways
1.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Ok building, but garbage is an issue
Former Tenant
Pros:
Newerish fixtures, easy payment methods
Cons:
Trash problem. Trash area infested with rats
Advice to owner:
Hire someone who cares to deal with the trash.
1.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
It was ok
Former Tenant
Pros:
Convenient to many restaurants - it was easy to let people into the building when I was at work through the intercom system
Cons:
No heat and gas for months, which the abatement did not cover the cost of food without a stove.
The last year there, the place was overrun by mice.
Advice to owner:
Take care of the vermin problem.
2.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Not clean!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very good location
Cons:
Rodent problem never fully resolved; trash room is always crammed full and inaccessible; packages constantly stolen from inside the 1st floor landing (likely a result of main doors not automatically latching shut); previous issues of noise from top floor residents (would host parties for dozens of attendees every few days in top floor unit and rooftop)
Advice to owner:
Resolve the rodent issue, ensure the door works and shuts upon entry/exit, install cameras on 1st fl landing as deterrent
1.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Unsafe, rodent infested & dirty
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location but now wouldn’t recommend that part so much either.
Cons:
Front doors are always broken. They don’t latch and is unsafe. Packages stolen constantly. Rodent issues ongoing. Walls in tenant unit (and others)left open for nearly a year for “gas issues” ? Trash area is disgusting and constantly filled. They lie about the monthly pest control (haven’t seen them in months and the paper sign up sheet is inaccurate and now behind locked glass thus making it inaccessible....) To top it off- The management has been shockingly insensitive across the pandemic, threatening to even raise rent by 2.5x .... oh and if you’re late on rent whatsoever they’ll ignore things like your stove or heat not working. Disgrace.
Advice to owner:
Fix the doors. Fix the rodent issue. Listen to your tenants. Fix that janky step that’s broken in the stairwell. Stop threatening tenants and/or ignoring them on C-level complaints. Have some empathy and stop harassing your few tenants that remain. Instead of pushing us out so you can do renovations.