Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.9 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jan 11, 2022: § 53, 187, 231 m/d law and department rules and regulations. provide a shoe properly secured to bottom of string of dropladder at north building front at fire escape
Show all
Hazardous
5
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 28, 2019: § 300, 301, 302, m/d law file plans and obtain a certificate of occupancy to legalize the following alteration or restore premises to prior legal condition room created at roof creating a duplex with apartment 5b at 6th story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
9
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jan 19, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code & 309 m/d law abate the nuisance consisting of hot water exceeding 130 degrees at hot water fixtures in the entire apartment located at apt 3c, 4th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
C
29 Clinton St Assoc
2.5(3)
Owner•
1 Property•20 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
P
Patricio Sanchez
2.5(3)
Site Manager•
1 Property•20 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
P
63 Pitt Street Owners Corp
4(47)
Corporate Owner•
9 Properties•256 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
C
29 Clinton Street Associates
2.5(3)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•36 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
3.62 stars
1 month ago
Great Spot, Cozy Apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, awesome roof access, Super was very nice and helpful and very responsive to pressing issues. Packages were never stolen. Furnished apartments.
Cons:
Super could be slow to respond to some issues. Stairs are super steep. Street is noisey. No washer/dryer in building or unit.
1.75 stars
7 months ago
Unresponsive and dirty
Former Tenant
Pros:
good location, and that's it
Cons:
- dirty - stolen packages almost every day - super never responds and does not come in a timely manner - neighbors are loud and rude to your face - very old building with no elevator or laundry - temperature in apartments either gets way too cold or hot
2.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Colorful management and their not-so-colorful practices
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building is well located, and, if you’re living on the 5th floor,you have a great roof access
Cons:
The landlord and his building management company — kicks people out two days earlier than the lease ends — when one person out of X people living in a co-living space deals with what X-1 people left after themselves, they get punished.
The building management should be sued for causing harm to someone’s health as they do not care about people with health conditions ~ to them a disability is a joke — something non-existing.
Advice to owner:
You might wanna stop kicking people out and making them live on the streets for two nights before their new lease starts. As well, you might want to actually adhere to the contract and not end the lease two days early.