635 East 9 Street,Manhattan, NY 10009
24 Units
•Built in 1900
•6 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
14 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.41 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
6
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 03, 2023: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code fire egress defective. remove obstructing bars or unlawful gates from window to fire escape or provide approved type gate in the 1st room from north at west located at apt 14, 4th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 03, 2023: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective missing vestibule door at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
P
Paul Stallings
3.2(4)
Head Officer•
1 Property•24 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 2
H
Henry Stallings
3.2(4)
Agent•
Officer•
1 Property•24 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 2
P
Patricio Sanchez
3.2(4)
Site Manager•
1 Property•24 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 2
J
Jasper Paul Associates
3.2(4)
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•24 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
3.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
cute neighborhood, slightly concerning safety, difficult commute
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cute neighborhood, you can see a community garden from home. Good light, close to nice restaurants
Cons:
far away from subway, neighborhood was not too safe there were a lot of bars so drunk people and crazy people hang around
4.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
Lovely apartment block
Former Tenant
Pros:
Lovely sized one bedroom apartment layout.
Nice location near Tompkins Square Park.
Good in-apartment laundry on a few floors.
Virtual doorman.
Nice location near Tompkins Square Park.
Good in-apartment laundry on a few floors.
Virtual doorman.
Cons:
Quite a noisy stairwell.
Not a lot of light in the apartments due to the layout.
Not a lot of light in the apartments due to the layout.
Advice to owner:
Would be great to have keypad entry to the laundry rooms rather than keys.
2.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
Fuck Paul stallings
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location in the village
Cons:
Management and owners are terrible, don’t care about the tenants, owner has an anger issue. Accused me of “losing” a tray in the freezer that was non existent in the first place and when I asked about why they were charging me 120$ for that the owner, Paul stallings, threatened to charge me more if I didn’t “get the fuck out of his office” and he also asked if I wanted to fight him? The owner is clearly unstable and also the apartment I was in had no heat, there was not an actual radiator and it was basically unlivable in the winter.
1 stars
Over 2 years ago
Avoid this building
Former Tenant
Pros:
The neighbors were all in agreement with the awful management. There’s no elevator so you get extra exercise, especially if you have groceries and have to make several trips up and down the stairs
Cons:
The landlord(s) don’t care about the tenants, won’t turn the heat on, I had to sleep with 6 blankets all winter. The water pressure is awful, the super doesn’t speak English. Just a nightmare to have had to live here for a year. The heat poles are not covered and are dangerous, I burned Myself several times
Advice to owner:
Develop some integrity and care for the building housing the peoples money you take consistently.