Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.12 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Sep 01, 2016: section 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove all encumbrances consisting of house hold items etc... at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
V
Village Jv 201 East Second LLC
3.2(13)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•45 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
K
Kc3 - 354-356 State Street, LLC
3.1(153)
Corporate Owner•
56 Properties•851 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 11
Kevin Schreiber
3.1(168)
Officer•
Head Officer•
66 Properties•1027 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 16
Westminster Management
3.2(138)
Agent•
54 Properties•1205 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 18
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (7)
3 stars
Over 1 year ago
Not bad... but not great
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building was in a super convenient area, so for people who prioritize location, this isn't a bad place to live. The area is super lively and I never felt unsafe coming home late at night, whether it was during the week or over the weekend. All of the tenants seem to be in their early through mid-to-late 20s, which was cool. I made a lot of friends in the building who I continue to keep in touch with! We lived in a true 2 bedroom and it wasn't bad! Also the building itself is relatively clean and I never experienced any pest-related issues other than like, ONE bug that crawled up the drain. However, that's about all of the positive things I can say.
Cons:
Management is super unresponsive and extremely greedy. Instead of having regular heaters, they switched heaters in the building to ones plugged into the wall, forcing the tenants to pay for the heat bill as opposed to including it in the rent. The heater in my room was completely broken and management couldn't figure out the part needed to fix the heater so they just gave me a space heater instead... which was fine and probably kept our electric bill lower than it would have been if the heater actually worked. Also, we didn't have mailboxes for like 3 months, which is super illegal. Packages are constantly stolen (through a mix of being an inside job and by the people constantly loitering on the stoop) and management was adamant about the fact that they just simply could not install cameras inside the hallways, which is a bunch of BS. Also.. sometimes individuals experiencing homelessness will fall asleep on the stoop.. and other tenants and I saw others shooting up/engaging in illegal activities on the stoop late at night as well. However, as far as I know, nothing's ever happened and tenants have never been harmed.
Advice to owner:
Stop being so greedy and pay for your tenants' heat. Also, handle serious issues (like the mailboxes) in a timely manner and be more responsive.
2.38 stars
Over 1 year ago
Alright for location and layout
Former Tenant
Pros:
True 2 bedroom, great natural light, no bugs or pests
Cons:
Loud, lots of package stealing, management sucks
2.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Perfect location, paper thin walls, predatory MGMT company.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Amazing location in east village Mostly friendly neighbors, except for tech bros and NYU kids The Super was AMAZING! Super responsive, met his family, even gave me pasta to take home one time
Cons:
They raised my rent for 130 % (almost double and a half!) when I moved out.
The walls are PAPER! They literally bent when pressed and I could hear every single word my neighbors said.
Water tasted a little off, and often ran out of heat in winter, but that's to be expected in an old building
Advice to owner:
Buy earplugs, and don't expect them to keep your rent at the price you paid last year.
3 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good not great
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, restaurants, natural light
Cons:
Steep stairwell, frequent tenants opening roof door which sounds alarm that doesn’t turn off unless a super is home
2 stars
Over 2 years ago
Pretty awful building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location and nice light on the upper floors
Cons:
Really awful management — dirty, unresponsive when things break (they broke a lot), and roaches. Packages get stolen and when I lived there they said the lobby cameras didn’t actually work
Advice to owner:
Give a shit!
3.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
No major problems - n
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building itself was surprisingly quiet for housing mostly people in 20s but louder outside since it's on an avenue.
Never had an issue with bugs or rodents.
Super was very nice and responsive.
Cons:
Roommates window leaked excessively during storms and water became trapped behind plaster. Very difficult to get management to do anything about it - I imagine it could have turned into a mold problem after we left.
Across from fire station so there will be frequent sirens.
Advice to owner:
Try to get on top of property issues when they are reported so they don't become a bigger problem in the long run.
3.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Westiminster Sucks Forreal
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean and good location.
Cons:
Submitting maintenance requests literally never worked and nobody would pick up the phone.