542 East 11 Street,Manhattan, NY 10009
20 Units
•Built in 1920
•5 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
23 complaints
Get rental reports for more information
You Will Get:
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.2 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
9
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 01, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
Hazardous
12
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 08, 2023: § 27-2026 adm code remove all obstructions and repair all defects in the clogged bathtub in the bathroom located at apt 1a, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 08, 2023: § 27-2005 adm code replace with new the broken or defective lock at the west 1 window in the 1st room from north located at apt 1a, 2nd story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 15, 2023: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
J
Jg 542 Associates LLC
2.5(19)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•48 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
I
Igor Ger
2.5(24)
Shareholder•
Officer•
Head Officer•
6 Properties•75 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
M
Moreliya Management
2.3(5)
Agent•
1 Property•20 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
R
611 Realty, LLC
2.5(24)
Corporate Owner•
6 Properties•75 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
2.25 stars
9 months ago
Poorly managed place
Former Tenant
Pros:
People living in the building are great
gets good light
gets good light
Cons:
Exterminator 1x per month, but mice still in walls
super is non responsive
building management team is awful
super is non responsive
building management team is awful
Advice to owner:
fire your management team
2.125 stars
Over 2 years ago
Terribly Managed Building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location
Video/Voice intercom (sometimes broken)
Video/Voice intercom (sometimes broken)
Cons:
Terribly managed by landlord
Non-responsiveness to tenant issues
Heating system broken or faulty (heating and cooling is an electrical window unit)
Frequent pest issues
Poor landlord communication (for scheduled work, construction, etc.)
Non-responsiveness to tenant issues
Heating system broken or faulty (heating and cooling is an electrical window unit)
Frequent pest issues
Poor landlord communication (for scheduled work, construction, etc.)
3.125 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good location, but not the comfiest stay
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location is excellent, kitchen renovated and functional
Cons:
The floor was uneven, bathroom tiny, packages often stolen, and pretty much no heat (unless you turn on the electric heater and thus pay for it yourself)
Advice to owner:
Better security for packages
1.125 stars
Over 2 years ago
Slumlord, awful.
Former Tenant
Pros:
It was close to a park.
Cons:
The day I moved in there was a bad leak in the apartment. Upon inspection, it was clear that this was a very old leak that was covered with fresh paint. I kept after the landlord. For a year, I had to cover my bed with a tarp every time it rained. There were rodents and roaches, a crack house down the street, my packages were stolen weekly, the buzzer never worked, and the landlord would ignore me about everything- until my boyfriend called. Then he was all ears and all promises!
Advice to owner:
Don’t put profit over the well being of people.
3 stars
Over 2 years ago
Not worth it
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location near the park
Cons:
The heater/AC smelled weird when turned on, old bathroom, bathroom too small, no soundproofing