Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
L
Lulo 888 LLC
3.2(9)
Agent•
2 Properties•32 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
A
Alex Laszlo
3.4(39)
Officer•
10 Properties•151 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 3
H
Haymchaud Bharat
3.2(9)
Officer•
2 Properties•32 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
L
167 Ludlow Owner LLC
3.4(62)
Corporate Owner•
16 Properties•297 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
2.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Typical LES Walkup
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location. Finishes in unit.
Cons:
Typical NYC heating where it’s always either too hot or too cold and you have no control. Public spaces were not kept clean. Water took forever to get warm.
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive.
3.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
New apartment with good management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The management is sresponsive and responsible. The building provides an online platform where you can pay rent, submit tickets for any issues, and receive response and announcement from the building, which saves a lot of calls and time which could be wasted on communication. The building is recently renovated, and the backyard is under construction to be transferred into a nice space for picnic and BIKE parking! My apartment is small and nice with a huge closet and brick walls. Perfect location and young neighborhood. Landry is 1 min walk distance.
Cons:
The landlord increased rent by 20% post COVID. The side facing Ludlow street is loud. The noice is worse in the summer because it comes through the AC and the street is more crowded (lots of bars downstairs). Packages got stolen very often.
Advice to owner:
Install camera and warning in the hallway to prevent packages from being stolen.
3.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Former Tenant @ 167 Ludlow
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location. New-ish-ly renovated apartments. Utilities always worked fine.
Cons:
These are studios, no matter if the broker can “legally” call them a one bedroom. Water pressure was low. Roof has leaked during heavy rains.
2.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
It’s a trap! Avoid at all costs.
Former Tenant
Pros:
The appliances and cabinetry are relatively new. The sliding frosted glass doors that turn a studio into something closer to a one bedroom are nice.
Cons:
Management is terrible. A supposed 3-6 month construction project has dragged on for nearly a year. The construction caused regular problems with noise, heat, water, and building security (also building integrity, at one point a building inspector made an emergency visit). Package theft is rampant. Once, the front door code was changed in the middle of the day without alerting residents and multiple people got locked out of the building. Heat was below legally mandated levels in the winter. This building looks nice and the rent appears reasonable for the neighborhood (if you are okay with the very small unit size), but the amenities (like the promised back garden that has been claimed to be a few weeks away from completion for months now) are a trick to get you in the door. Believe nothing that management tells you. The “preferential rent” rider in the lease is a trick to basically sign away your right to complain about poor treatment.