69 1 Avenue,Manhattan, NY 10003
19 Units
•Built in 1900
•5 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: Yes
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Available Listings In 69 1 Avenue
Don't miss out on any new listings!
Save buildings to your favorites and we'll let you know as soon as something becomes available.
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
9 complaints
See all complaints about this building in a rental report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.57 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
4
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jan 31, 2018: section 27-2005 adm code properly repair the broken or defective bell/buzzer/intercom system at north wall in the kitchen located at apt 5, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Hazardous
4
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jan 31, 2018: section 27-2026 adm code replace the broken or defective radiator shut-off valve in the 3rd room from east located at apt 5, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 10, 2021: hmc adm code: � 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 5, 3rd story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Mads Limited Liability Company
2.5(4)
Owner•
1 Property•19 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
M
Mads, LLC
2.5(4)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•43 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
C
Charles Carroll
2.5(4)
Site Manager•
1 Property•19 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
E
175-177 East Third Associates LP
4(20)
Corporate Owner•
27 Properties•466 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 8
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
2 stars
Over 1 year ago
Filled with roaches
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cannot hear neighbors, great location, friendly super
Cons:
Rent goes up significantly each year (approx 20%), tons of roaches, had bedbugs in 2019
2.625 stars
Over 1 year ago
No real maintenance
Former Tenant
Pros:
The neighborhood is great.
Cons:
Prohibited from cleaning outside of windows in lease but they haven’t been cleaned in years, the hallways are almost never cleaned and even then just a quick sweep, no particular amenities to make this building worth it in any way. They leave graffiti and bird poop all over the front until a couple days before they expect to list an apartment. The doors often have gaps and so you can hear all the hallway noises. They use the same description for every apartment in the building when listing. Any work they did was cheaply done and often used incorrect materials (like the wrong caulking). The staircases and outcroppings on the walls have years worth of dust built up.
Advice to owner:
Pay a service to clean the place once in a while so it looks bare minimum presentable.
3.125 stars
Over 2 years ago
Okay bldg, not worth market value
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighbors are long term, always feels safe in that way. It’s not overly noisy and decent location. Some apartments get great light.
Cons:
The bldg is old and dirty, windows are old and drafty, heat is intermittent, lately the water temperature varies a lot and pressure has always been bad. Overall some of the renovations done over the years were clearly slapped together. Issues tend to take a long time to be fixed.
Advice to owner:
Replace the old windows, clean them once in a while, get a service in to clean the whole hallway once in a while as there are years-old layers of dust. Don’t have the same contractors work on things that did in the past.
2.125 stars
Over 2 years ago
Poorly maintained building
Former Tenant
Pros:
location and layout
Cons:
management company is awful