55 Third Avenue,Manhattan, NY 10003
55 Units
•Built in 1986
•12 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.03 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Feb 01, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective radiator in the 1st room from east located at apt 705, 7th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
SC 200 East 11th Street Two LLC
4.3(10)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•280 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
G
Grep Atlantic LLC
3.7(23)
Agent•
5 Properties•335 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
B
Bale Muriqi
4.1(6)
Site Manager•
1 Property•55 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
H
Hy 38 Owner LLC
4.3(10)
Head Officer•
3 Properties•280 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (6)
4 stars
6 months ago
all around ok
Former Tenant
Pros:
the super is very responsive,
Cons:
the a/c sucks because it does not get cold enough and is super expensive. the heating also does not get hot enough in the winter. the property management company is super unresponsive. also the kitchen counter stains easily.
5 stars
6 months ago
Great apartment with caring super but less responsive management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building is in general very well maintained. Ering the super and China the doorwoman do a great job keeping the main areas of the building clean and tidy and they are both super responsive and kind. The apartment itself is on the smaller side but the appliances are top notch and we have had very few issues during our stay here.
Cons:
The kitchen counters are a weird concrete that soak up spilled liquids and stain which is kind of weird. The rent is expensive. There are only two treadmills in the gym, one of which has been off/broken(?) for more than a year and the other which has been squeaky for about the same amount of time. We complained to management about this multiple times but it hasn't resulted in any changes because management is not very responsive.
Advice to owner:
Please be more responsive to tenant complaints!
4.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Nice location and good views
Former Tenant
Pros:
1. Window and views are nice
2. New appliances
3. Neighbors are quiet
2. New appliances
3. Neighbors are quiet
Cons:
1. street noise if facing the street
2. sink sometimes clogged
2. sink sometimes clogged
Advice to owner:
maybe should have a full-time doorman for the price
4 stars
Over 2 years ago
Mixed & expensive
Former Tenant
Pros:
- no pests
- nice finishes
- location
- w/d for 1&2bds
- big windows
- nice finishes
- location
- w/d for 1&2bds
- big windows
Cons:
- STEEP RENTAL INCREASE ($1k+)
- advertises verizon fios but only spectrum
is available
- cut full time doorman & then again lessened hours on doorman part time service
- some residents are loud and the soundproofing is mixed
- advertises verizon fios but only spectrum
is available
- cut full time doorman & then again lessened hours on doorman part time service
- some residents are loud and the soundproofing is mixed
4.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
Good but expensive
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean, haven't had bug issues
Cons:
Got rid of 24/7 doorman and raised laundry prices
2.88 stars
Over 3 years ago
Very Loud, MGMT unresponsive
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location was great
Cons:
Our apartment was facing the back and we thought it would be quiet and were reassured that it would be. During the day it was fine but Unfortunately it was so unbearably loud at night we rarely got sufficient sleep. The restaurants make a ton of noise when they take out their garbage and the windows don’t do anything to dampen the noise. The finishes in the apartment are also very cheap, most of which is not a big problem but the countertops were porous and stained easily. This resulted in a huge fine for us after living there only a year. The super said this happened “all the time” so it is not an uncommon occurrence. They also withheld our security deposit for months after it was supposed to be returned to us as well.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here