A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.46 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 14, 2021: § 27-2005 adm code paint metal in accordance with dept. regulation heat radiator at west wall in the 5th room from east located at apt 5, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Hazardous
8
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Apr 05, 2021: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at north wall at public hall, 4th story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 08, 2021: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 24, 7th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
T
Tara Dexter
2.9(7)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•30 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
K
Kc3 - 354-356 State Street, LLC
3.1(154)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
56 Properties•851 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 11
L
Livingston Management Services LLC
3(148)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
161 Properties•2943 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 134
C
Cesar Cruz
2.9(7)
Site Manager•
1 Property•26 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (7)
3.62 stars
7 months ago
Stay away! Run!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, location, location!
Cons:
The management team is HORRIBLE and not responsive!
Advice to owner:
Do your job. Fix problems in a timely manner! Not 18 months after the issue began!
2 stars
9 months ago
Overpriced, Old, Unsafe
Former Tenant
Pros:
Big apt for the village
Cons:
Poor water pressure, loud street, concerns about lead paint, concerns about pest infestations, no closets, apt was not cleaned for move in
Advice to owner:
How can you overcharge when there are over 40 complaints against this building??
4.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
great location in west village
Former Tenant
Pros:
felt safe on a busy street
Cons:
tight walk up
3.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great area, older building, dirty street, some pests
Former Tenant
Pros:
Phenomenal area Great lighting Effective buzz-in system
Cons:
Some pests (cockroaches) No in building laundry
Advice to owner:
Do everything possible to stay on top of pest control. The street generates a lot of trash which attracts them. I realize this is out of the building managements control, but it’s nonetheless something to be aware of and work to mitigate
1.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
A disaster of a building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Arguably nothing! Except location, which is questionable, too!
Cons:
Every day, I would wake up half a dozen mice would be trapped on glue traps in the kitchen alone, trash piled up in the main doorway, disruptive construction that had no reason to be occurring except to harass rent-stabilized tenants though it worked to harass those who were at market rate too! Any and every complaint was systematically ignored and money was (of course) stolen. Truly a disaster.
Advice to owner:
Sell the building. Spare people your ineptitude. It’s one of the worse living situations I was ever in.
2.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
Horrible Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
N/A don’t have any
Cons:
120 Macdougal is mismanaged by Westminster Properties. I lived in this buildings for one year. I didn’t have horrible issues with my apartment besides mold in the shower. With that said, Management is totally unresponsive at all times - it was extremely frustrating to not be able to reach anyone via phone call or get a response via email - even after leaving 10 messages, emailing 10 times. They would email me non stop with information about paying rent but when you respond with questions, they don’t email back. I had to threaten legal action to get them to tell me my move out procedures / get my security deposit back. This is not the type of living experience you should get when paying 2500 a month for rent. I would not recommend this building.
Advice to owner:
Respond to your tenants. Your building is plummeting in value, the least you could do is ensure the people who are paying rent want to stay.
2.25 stars
Over 3 years ago
Pest control an issue
Former Tenant
Pros:
Honestly not many
Cons:
Garbage management is horrible Lots of mice Small units No closet space
Advice to owner:
Fix garbage management situation
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here