A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 18 hours ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.25 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jun 23, 2022: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system at or near mailbox at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
P
Peter Tran
3.4(53)
Site Manager•
Head Officer•
12 Properties•202 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
G
61 Grove St LLC
3.7(8)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•20 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
W
120-22 W 25 Street LLC
3.3(66)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
31 Properties•402 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (7)
2.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
61 Grove Street
Former Tenant
Pros:
great area, exposed brick, closet space, good light
Cons:
terrible management, unresponsive, take advantage of tenants, extremely over priced
Advice to owner:
lower your prices, clean your building regularly, respond to tenants
3.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Nice building lacking manager
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice building, clean, everything is quite nice.
Cons:
Property managers could do a bit more to be more helpful.
4.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
A Great Apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean, well maintained, and great location!
Cons:
This apartment can be noisy since there are so many bars and it is a busy area.
3.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Management appears to be missing
Former Tenant
Pros:
This building has great units for large groups and is in an incredible location
Cons:
The management is completely unresponsive. You will never be able to contact anyone directly in case of an emergency and instead are consistently rooted through an answering service and online filing.
2.83 stars
Over 3 years ago
Pretty bad landlord. Pretty loud building
Former Tenant
Pros:
New appliances. Awesome location
Cons:
Loud, college like building. Bad landlords
Advice to owner:
Rent too high. Stop trying to take advantage of renters
3.17 stars
Over 3 years ago
Great apartment, horrible landlord
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cleanliness, size, decor
Cons:
Landlord’s to respond to maintenance requests, leak in ceiling, stolen packages, unable to compromise during pandemic, unresponsive unless you are one day late on rent then they bombard you
Advice to owner:
Don’t be so sleazy. Just respond to maintenance requests that is your responsibility
2.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
Difficult landlord, good building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location and building
Cons:
Landlord is extremely rude
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here