A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 8 hours ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.15 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Dec 19, 2023: § 27-2005 adm code paint metal in accordance with dept. regulation riser pipe at south in the 2nd room from east located at apt 61, 6th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jun 20, 2018: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair the broken or defective bell/ buzzer intercom system from the building entrance door to the apartment wall panel located at apt 53, 5th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Dec 27, 2023: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges at bulkhead door , 6th story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
W
162 West 13th Street LLC
3.7(18)
Corporate Owner•
6 Properties•117 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
A
A Sanieoff
3.7(18)
Site Manager•
Agent•
Head Officer•
6 Properties•117 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
F
211-217 First Avenue LLC
3.7(9)
Corporate Owner•
6 Properties•64 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
L
122-124 Ludlow LLC
3.1(16)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•71 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
3.62 stars
1 month ago
no major issues
Former Tenant
Pros:
nice (pretty high quality materials in bathrooms/kitchens), new, clean, open/wide building hallways, updated/nice/big bathroom, really nice and responsive live-in super who helps when locked out, no negative interactions with neighbors, great location, very few issues with things breaking/not working
Cons:
gnats when its warm and nobody to do anything about it (i set traps, plugged drains, never had food/fruit/trash out and still had a major problem), packages stolen often (has become less frequent since video intercom installation though), elevator always broken, took forever to install virtual doorman (like 8 months later than promised), "package room" never completed, walls are extremely thin, very little natural light in internal facing apts, landlord group tries to illegally charge you hundreds for very minor maintenance when i am pretty sure they legally can't (i.e. unclogging drain), landlord group ghosts you when they dont want to deal with concerns (questions about when things will be installed/concerns about building)
2.62 stars
3 months ago
Terrible, sketchy management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Mostly new technology in the units
Cons:
Awful management, routine attempts to cheat the tenants out of services that were previously guaranteed, will keep your security deposit
2.75 stars
Over 3 years ago
Absentee owners, good location
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, apt size is big for the area
Cons:
Owners don’t respond to anything. Construction noise next door is wretched. Building has been empty now rents are jacked up but zero building improvements. Also it’s impossible to do recycling.
Advice to owner:
Respond to emails. Don’t just collect the rent and provide zero service.
2.25 stars
Over 3 years ago
Absentee owners
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location and the layout of my apt
Cons:
Building isn’t maintained, construction next door is intolerable
Advice to owner:
Pretend you own the building
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here