Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.05 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Feb 13, 2019: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at ceiling and all walls in the 1st room from north located at apt 2c, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
U
United East LLC
3.6(44)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
22 Properties•546 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
M
Mark Harounian
3.7(50)
Shareholder•
Officer•
Head Officer•
30 Properties•636 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
U
United Flatiron LLC
3.8(5)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•43 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
M
Marco Salazar
3.7(3)
Site Manager•
1 Property•18 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
3 stars
Over 1 year ago
TERRIBLE MANAGEMENT, BROKEN ELEVATOR
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, cheap rent for the neighborhood, fairly spacious apartment
Cons:
The management is awful, rude, and irresponsible. I had an emergent issue with my apartment and they refused to come. Then, they refused to compensate me for the money I had to spend to fix it. The super lied about a conversation we had and the landlord is completely unresponsive. Additionally, the elevator has been broken more than it has worked. People regularly get stuck. I know the fire department well. Would not recommend moving here at all.
4 stars
Over 1 year ago
responsive mgmt, minimal issues
Former Tenant
Pros:
Responsive management to maintenance requests, quiet and wonderful location, great neighbors
Cons:
Minimal upkeep of common spaces (trash, hallways, stairwell, etc)
4.17 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good located but mismanaged
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, elevator, not too many units
Cons:
Water heater broke multiple times during winter, no live in super so took a while to get things fixed