See all complaints about this building in a rental report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 3 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Manuel Tomassini
3.8(12)
Site Manager•
1 Property•178 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
A
Abi Kalimian
4.2(20)
Owner•
3 Properties•293 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
A
Alexander Berley
3.8(12)
Agent•
1 Property•178 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (12)
3.875 stars
2 months ago
Great place to live
Former Tenant
Pros:
Spacious, Great Doormen and Staff
Cons:
Had mice and ants
2.625 stars
3 months ago
“luxury” doesn’t live here
Former Tenant
Pros:
convenient to subway
Cons:
Loud, revolving door of unqualified maintenance people, the super is a creep, delivery people still not allowed to come upstairs and doormen do nothing
Advice to owner:
If you want to call it luxury and charge luxury prices get a staff who actually does something
4.875 stars
8 months ago
A Gramercy Gem
Former Tenant
Pros:
The doormen and employees in the building couldn't be nicer.
Cons:
A unit on the lower floor had a hole by the toilet that led to cockroaches in the apartment but the issue was eventually resolved by the management.
3.375 stars
11 months ago
Good building high prices
Former Tenant
Pros:
Staff is great
Cons:
Says updates are coming have not seen
4.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
Good first apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doormen very nice Overall well run building Super very responsive
Cons:
Temperature control was hard for the unit, and it was super hot for most of the year requiring me to run my AC all year Surrounding area has a couple resident homeless people who have been aggressive
5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great building, hidden gem, reasonably priced
Former Tenant
Pros:
I loved this building. It is clean and well maintained. It is run by a great company, I had zero complaints. Everything works and rarely had an issue (if ever). It is well priced for the location, level of services, quality of apartments, and amenities. It is a secret hidden gem! Apartments are also big for the area and renovated!!
Cons:
Literally no cons
Advice to owner:
Build more buildings lol
4.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Does the trick
Former Tenant
Pros:
Relatively affordable, amazing location, variety of different options
Cons:
Interior apartments very dark
Advice to owner:
Perhaps can upgrade tech systems to be able to submit requests
3.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great Place to Live if in Young 20s
Former Tenant
Pros:
Young demographic, clean, laundry in building
Cons:
Horrible appliances, stove top was an electric coil that never stayed in straight. White fridge and dishwasher
3.375 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good young professional first apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Subways nearby and close to union square, package system worked well, front desk was always staffed, bathroom was renovated and nice
Cons:
Neighbors were young, some mice and bugs, permanent window AC units were very dirty (dust, possibly mold)
4.125 stars
Over 2 years ago
Overall good quality
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, doorman and super, lobby
Cons:
Dark apartments, noise closer to street level
Advice to owner:
Update the kitchens / bathrooms
4.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great amenities, fantastic neighborhood.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevators, doorman, mail room, laundry room, garbage chute, roof, sometimes great furniture finds in the basement!
Cons:
Often slow response from the super for help, occasional cockroach sightings, major intersection so traffic sounds, elevator can be slow sometimes.
1.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Abington Properties: crooks
Former Tenant
Pros:
1 doorman who is good at his job (Mark).
Cons:
Overpriced. A homeless man was sleeping in front of my front door one night bc security isn’t a thing. There was a rape in Abington’s Kips Bay property. Negligence. A lot of nice and roaches.