NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
Midtown East
/
Kips Bay
/
95 Lexington Avenue
Kips Bay

95 Lexington Avenue,
Manhattan, NY 10016

77 Units

•

Built in 1939

•

6 Floors

3(5)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    23 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 week ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.06 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    4
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Mar 12, 2018: section 27-2045 adm code post a proper notice of smoke detector requirements, in a form approved by the commissioner, at or near the mail box missing at public hall, 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    1
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Dec 06, 2017: section 27-2005, 2007 adm code fire egress defective. remove obstructing bars or unlawful gates from window to fire escape or provide approved type gate ... in the kitchen located at apt 4n, 4th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    0
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    D
    David Mandracchia
    3(5)
    Joint Owner•
    1 Property•77 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 1
    logo
    Eileen Shields
    4(245)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    521 Properties•38413 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 112
    A
    Alan Nagel
    3(5)
    Joint Owner•
    1 Property•77 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 1
    N
    Nagel Partners, LP
    3(5)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•124 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 1
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (5)

    7 months ago
    Negligent Management, Homeless use the vestibule for sleeping and bathroom
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Close to subway
    Cons:
    The Super puts in the least amount of effort when the porter is not on duty. The porter works most days
    and works very hard. Therefore the building is not well tended to and the laundry room is always wet and dirty machines. Garbage piles up. Serious mail theft. Very HIGH Rent!!!
    Advice to owner:
    Answer the damn phone!
    Over 1 year ago
    Good apartment, minor issues
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Well kept building, central location, laundry, large apartments
    Cons:
    Had bugs (but management was responsive), crazy neighbor who yelled and banged on the ceiling, raising rents every year significantly
    Advice to owner:
    none
    Over 1 year ago
    Not what it used to be
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Pre war building quiet block
    Cons:
    Owner who is destroying the charm of building ugly hideous renovations. Will rent to anyone too many people not enough laundry. Mostly absent super. Management company especially management agent suck. The laundry room is a joke with full occupancy there need to be more machines. Half the time they a broken and full of mold!
    Advice to owner:
    Quit doing illegal conversions. Stop doing renovations with illegal workers now of these days DOH will be able to get in and prove our complaints. Try to be more like your father was in treatment of your tenants. He was a gentleman and would not be proud of what has happened to this building. With every passing year the building goes down more.
    Over 2 years ago
    David Mandrachia manager 100% non responsive
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Location and transportation
    Cons:
    Management and management the worst!
    Advice to owner:
    Stop bastardizing the prewar apartments and leave the “renovations” alone!
    Over 2 years ago
    Great location. Supers very friendly and helpful
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Convenience, elevator, laundry
    Cons:
    No doorman and rent a bit high