NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
Midtown East
/
Kips Bay
/
137 East 26 Street
Kips Bay

137 East 26 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10010

35 Units

•

Built in 1920

•

6 Floors

3.6(3)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Available Listings In 137 East 26 Street
    unit
    Kips Bay
    137 East 26 Street #A1
    $3,264
    1 bed•1 bath•Est. Feb 2025
    Future
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    36 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 5 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.08 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    1
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 12, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the ceiling in the vestibule , 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    0
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    2
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 12, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardant material at ceiling in vestibule , 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    D
    Duvi Peralta
    3.6(3)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•35 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    A
    Ahron Freidus
    3.6(3)
    Agent•
    1 Property•35 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    E
    137 E. 26 Realty LLC
    3.1(4)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    2 Properties•55 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 0
    K
    Keshala Halangoda
    3.3(114)
    Head Officer•
    69 Properties•2185 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 32
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (3)

    6 months ago
    Got the job done
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    competitive price never found a bug or mouse in apt
    Cons:
    lobby and package area were gross.
    8 months ago
    Lived for a year
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    -good water pressure
    -not too noisy
    -thick walls
    -no mold, rodents or roaches
    Cons:
    -landlord company is sketchy and hard to reach
    -super was never at the building
    -lots of fights/shouting/arguments in the hallway and lots of stolen packages!
    Advice to owner:
    Do something about all the mail being stolen
    9 months ago
    Do not move to an SW management building
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    redid floors before I moved in, decent appliances, great windows
    Cons:
    Management will gaslight you
    heat is inconsistent
    excrement and throw up on landing from a squatter
    Advice to owner:
    listen to tenants, update security/ buzzer system