224 East 21 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10010

28 Units

Built in 1920

5 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
K
Kenneth Nagin
4(9)
Shareholder
Head Officer
4 Properties74 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
L
Laurance Nagin
3.5(4)
Shareholder
Officer
4 Properties43 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
F
Fatmir Durakovic
3.5(4)
Site Manager
1 Property28 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
C
Carla Hanson
3.8(5)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties44 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

Over 1 year ago
Mice and break-ins
Former Tenant
Pros:
The super is very friendly, apt is in a great location
Cons:
Lived on the first floor of this building for 2 years with mice the entire time. We filed several complaints and had pest control walk through just to tell us they couldn’t figure it out. Saw a few cockroaches as well but nothing crazy. There’s a man in the basement who likes to scream out into the alley angrily as well as some college kids who party outside until 3am and the supers don’t mind. The worst experience living here was finding out the hard way that all apartments within the building have the same exact key. We arrived home one night to two college kids digging through our fridge and were extremely alarmed.
Advice to owner:
I suggest switching out the keys so that everyone has their own individual key and to also look into the mice problem.
Over 3 years ago
Not great, Paul
Former Tenant
Pros:
Centrally located which is very convenient
Cons:
Building management is terrible, doesn’t seem to care about pest issues or holes in the wall

Property manager and super are impossible to reach
Advice to owner:
Please be easier to reach and actually listen to tenants.
Over 3 years ago
Great apartment in gramercy
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, responsive management company
Cons:
Old building, no gas for a bit but was compensated with rent reduction (not really a con)
Over 3 years ago
Incompetent Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location and building exterior.
Cons:
Persistent pot smoke in the halls and seeping into apartment. Owner didn’t care or do anything about it despite this specifically forbidden in the contract. Very attentive to making sure tenant abides by the lease.
Advice to owner:
Care a whit about the quality of life in your building. Instead of complaining about hardship due to vacancies be attentive to reasonable complaints when you receive them, and address them so that residents stay.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here