See all complaints about this building in a rental report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.02 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 30, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code provide heavy duty latch set and assembly at vestibule door
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Arsale Realty Company LLC
4(20)
Corporate Owner•
76 Properties•9706 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 88
R
Rose Property Mgmt Grp LLC
4.1(20)
Agent•
46 Properties•7034 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 68
E
210-220 E. 22nd Street Ssga Owner, LLC
0(0)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•261 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 4
A
Asmir Brdakic
0(0)
Site Manager•
1 Property•88 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (8)
1 stars
7 months ago
Cockroaches and mice
Former Tenant
Pros:
No pros at all.
Cons:
Infested with roaches and mice. Not exaggerating. Had to move out because it got so bad. German roaches EVERYWHERE
Advice to owner:
You guys suck
3.62 stars
Over 1 year ago
210-220 E 22nd
Former Tenant
Pros:
Responsive management and staff Gym access Package room Clean
Cons:
Some cockroaches in hall never saw in unit Neighbors can be young/loud but building seems to be changing Can hear neighbors
4.62 stars
Over 1 year ago
good management company
Former Tenant
Pros:
responsive, nice, good
Cons:
hallways can be slightly dirty
1.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
please stay away
Former Tenant
Pros:
nothing about this was good
Cons:
dead mouse in the common areas, loud neighbors, overpriced…avoid at all costs
4.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
210 E 22nd
Former Tenant
Pros:
Very clean, no pest issues, great natural light and big windows
Cons:
Building management just isn’t responsive
Advice to owner:
Respond to your renters
2.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Noise and neighbor issues
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location, heat/cooling worked well, if you can tolerate noise and pests it’s a decent place to live.
Cons:
Lots of mice, cockroaches, and pests. Building was recently renovated but poorly maintained, especially in common areas. Many ceiling leaks. Neighbors had lots of loud parties and would leave their trash in common places, and throw trash off the roof onto the street and terraces – often felt like a frat house. Doormen would often be missing or asleep during their shifts. Building water supply and heating is very noisy, even within the apartments. Lockout fee, even on the first time it happens.
4.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Well managed and good people
Former Tenant
Pros:
Building was clean but not fancy. Management company was relatively responsive to needs.
Cons:
No liver in super at the time
4.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great location in Gramercy
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, laundry on every floor, doorman building
Cons:
Apts are very small for the price, 1 and 2 bedrooms have weird layouts, almost no closet space