208 East 25 Street,Manhattan, NY 10010
22 Units
•Built in 1920
•5 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 208 East 25 Street
Kips Bay
208 East 25 Street #42
$4,152
1 bed•1 bath•Est. Jan 2025
Future
Kips Bay
208 East 25 Street #24
$5,307
2 beds•1 bath•Est. Feb 2025
Future
Kips Bay
208 East 25 Street #32
$4,036
1 bed•1 bath•Est. Feb 2025
Future
Kips Bay
208 East 25 Street #31
$4,152
1 bed•1 bath•Est. Mar 2025
Future
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.77 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
3
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 20, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at bulkhead ceiling and east wall , 5th story
Show all
Hazardous
6
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 19, 2024: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... less than 10sq ft at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 34, 3rd story, 1st apartment from north at east original violation 17116082 issued 16-jul-24 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
Show all
Immediately hazardous
7
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 01, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code & 309 m/d law abate the nuisance consisting of key operated lock at door leading to fire escape window in the 3rd room from north located at apt 43, 4th story, 2nd apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
C
Centennial Properties NY
3.1(104)
Agent•
73 Properties•1024 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 16
S
Steve Croman
3.1(319)
Head Officer•
191 Properties•2716 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 60
A
2172 Amsterdam LLC
3.1(29)
Corporate Owner•
23 Properties•331 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
A
Annabelle Santiago
3(120)
Officer•
74 Properties•969 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
3.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great super - subpar mgmt
Former Tenant
Pros:
Amazing super, nice location
Cons:
Mgmt is horrible for fixes
3.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
Decent Amenities, Less Space
Former Tenant
Pros:
Units are renovated/maintained, with relatively new fixtures and appliances. Bathroom is spacious, with a good shower. In-unit w/d is nice, though they are SMALL and the dryer isn’t the best.
Cons:
UPDATE 2023: look up Steve Croman and Centennial Properties before signing ANYTHING. This company is embroiled in law suits. Tenants have been sending their rent to a law firm since August 2022 because the company is engaged in illegal business practices.
The super scams new tenants out of $130 by uninstalling padlocks prior to move-in (leaving an open hole in the front door), then insisting that new tenants pay cash under the table to have a “new” padlock installed (he reinstalls the one he removed between tenants).
Definitely not paying for space, as the bedroom is cramped and there isn’t much counter space in the kitchen(ette) area. Also, in-unit w/d sounds nice in theory, but the washer is super small, and the dryer is either so hot it shrinks everything, or so mild that it doesn’t fully dry.
Also the super is only responsive when you submit a ticket through the property management site. Don’t let him bully you into working with him directly, he is shady as noted above, plus pretends to be responsive then never actually solves issues (unless there’s documentation with the property management company).
The super scams new tenants out of $130 by uninstalling padlocks prior to move-in (leaving an open hole in the front door), then insisting that new tenants pay cash under the table to have a “new” padlock installed (he reinstalls the one he removed between tenants).
Definitely not paying for space, as the bedroom is cramped and there isn’t much counter space in the kitchen(ette) area. Also, in-unit w/d sounds nice in theory, but the washer is super small, and the dryer is either so hot it shrinks everything, or so mild that it doesn’t fully dry.
Also the super is only responsive when you submit a ticket through the property management site. Don’t let him bully you into working with him directly, he is shady as noted above, plus pretends to be responsive then never actually solves issues (unless there’s documentation with the property management company).
Advice to owner:
Tell the super to stop trying to cut property management out of tenant interactions. He routinely bullies tenants into working with him directly, and it’s not great.
2.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
Bad managing company
Former Tenant
Pros:
Close to grocery stores, restaurants, and subway lines. Overall safe neighborhood. Amazing live-in supers who are responsive and always willing to help.
Cons:
There was an on-going cockroach problem coming into the building and the units. The stove would constantly break and management would take a long time to respond to our messages to try and fix the issue. The neighbors downstairs were loud and would watch tv early in the morning with the volume up. The heat would also be on really high; our windows were open during the winter. No exhaust in the kitchen so our apartment would smoke up and have the fire alarm go off often.
Advice to owner:
Add vents to the kitchen and bathroom. Address tenant issues quickly.
3.25 stars
Over 3 years ago
Mice in building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Back patios and balconies are great
Cons:
Mice and roaches in building
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here