NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
Midtown East
/
Kips Bay
/
232 East 26 Street
Kips Bay

232 East 26 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10010

22 Units

•

Built in 1920

•

5 Floors

3.6(3)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    6 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 4 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.5 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    0
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    9
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Apr 04, 2022: section 27-2056.7 and 27-2056.17 adm code -certify compliance with lead-based paint hazard control requirements during period of unit vacancy by submitting required supporting documentation and affidavits for apartment located at bsmt-apt 1, 1st bsmt-apt from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    2
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Mar 26, 2022: section 27-2056.4(h) and 27-2056.17 adm code -correct failure to provide to the department within 45 days of demand all records required to be maintained by owner pursuant to local law 1 of 2004 related to lead-based paint notices, inspections and remediation/abatement activities.
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    S
    Spencer Stein
    3.6(3)
    Head Officer•
    1 Property•22 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    G
    Grandview Management Corp
    3.6(3)
    Agent•
    2 Properties•72 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 4
    L
    Linward;realty Corporation
    3.6(3)
    Corporate Owner•
    1 Property•22 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    J
    Joe Rrukaj
    3.6(3)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•22 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (3)

    Over 2 years ago
    Nothing bad to say
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Quiet-ish, packages don’t get stolen, good water pressure
    Cons:
    Bugs, my toilet was broken for a month and the super wouldn’t come fix it, MOLD
    Over 2 years ago
    Solid building, great prices
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Well managed and easy living. Super responds to issues when needed and lives next door. Great prices. Very spacious apartments.
    Cons:
    Wish there was laundry but it’s right across the street.
    Over 2 years ago
    It works, but barely
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Lots of space.
    Cons:
    No frills here. Unresponsive super. Heat has to be on 80 to warm the place because of the drafts
    Advice to owner:
    Renovate! Add better lights in the hallway! Fix the heat for the building!