230 East 32 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10016

16 Units

Built in 1900

4 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 230 East 32 Street
unit
Kips Bay
230 East 32 Street #1A
$4,724
2 beds1 bathEst. Feb 2025
Future
unit
Kips Bay
230 East 32 Street #1C
$4,724
2 beds1 bathEst. Feb 2025
Future
unit
Kips Bay
230 East 32 Street #3A
$4,834
2 beds1 bathEst. Apr 2025
Future
unit
Kips Bay
230 East 32 Street #B
$4,834
2 beds1 bathEst. Apr 2025
Future
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.93 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
May 14, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the ceiling at vestibule
Show all
flag
Hazardous
8
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 14, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardent material at vestibule ceiling
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Apr 24, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 3d, 3rd story, 1st apartment from south at west , section ''south ''
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
Steve Croman
3.1(319)
Head Officer
191 Properties2716 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 60
E
228-230 E 32nd LLC
3.6(6)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties32 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
A
44 Ave B LLC
3.2(195)
Corporate Owner
106 Properties1783 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 46
N
New York City Management LLC
3.1(158)
Agent
116 Properties1722 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 47
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (3)

10 months ago
Good building all things considered
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great building for my first apartment in NYC, quiet, clean
Cons:
Lack of package room, had a couple packages stolen. Hot water goes out often during large rainstorms, generally for a day, but up to 3 days
Over 2 years ago
Experience
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice neighbors, for the most part quiet street, close to absolutely everything.
Cons:
Building management absolutely sucks. The super is nice but management is terrible. To get one thing fixed takes weeks, they like to do things on their time and dime. Will find the cheapest option to fix things. They do not care about you.
Advice to owner:
Find better people in management. They treat tenants very poorly.
Over 3 years ago
Horrible Management Company
Former Tenant
Pros:
None to note
Cons:
Never respond to emails, don’t fix issues, disorganized, don’t care about tenants, horrible employees, make tenants live in inhabitable apartments
Advice to owner:
Be better
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here