NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
Midtown East
/
Kips Bay
/
251 East 32 Street
Kips Bay

251 East 32 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10016

164 Units

•

Built in 1964

•

20 Floors

2.3(1)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Available Listings In 251 East 32 Street
    unit
    Kips Bay
    251 East 32 Street #7H
    $5,197
    1 bed•1 bath•Est. Dec 2024
    Future
    unit
    Kips Bay
    251 East 32 Street #6B
    $5,139
    1 bed•1 bath•Est. Mar 2025
    Future
    unit
    Kips Bay
    251 East 32 Street #7A
    $4,845
    1 bed•1 bath•Est. Apr 2025
    Future
    unit
    Kips Bay
    251 East 32 Street #15A
    $4,793
    1 bed•1 bath•Est. Mar 2025
    Future
    Hey smart renter!
    In the past three years, this building had:
    91 complaints
    Get building reports for more information
    You Will Get:
    call-center
    Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
    rat
    The latest rodent inspection reports.
    construction
    Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
    And more...
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 2 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    Less than 0.01 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    0
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    1
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Dec 15, 2023: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... at north wall approximately 2 sq ft in the 1st room from north located at apt 6e, 6th story, 3rd apartment from north at east original violation 16165789 issued 15-aug-23 has been upgraded to class b per administrative code §27-2017.3a(3)(a) or (b).
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    0
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    M
    Milford Management
    3.6(15)
    Agent•
    4 Properties•884 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 1
    I
    Ivan Blagojevic
    2.3(1)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•164 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    R
    Riverview East Owners Inc
    2.3(1)
    Corporate Owner•
    1 Property•164 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    L
    Louise Gruber
    2.3(1)
    Head Officer•
    1 Property•164 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (1)

    Over 2 years ago
    Rude & un-accommodating
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Doormen are the only good thing
    Cons:
    No rooftop, sarcastic management, no gym, co-op, just stay clear
    Advice to owner:
    Be more accommodating to residents and personable