A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.28 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
11
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jun 05, 2021: § 329, m/d law and dept. rules and regs. provide a completed certificate of inspection visits in a proper frame at or near mailboxes, bottom edge of frame between 48-62 inches above floor frame missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
2
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 06, 2020: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). deffective in the entire apartment located at apt 6a, 6th story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
7
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jun 05, 2021: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at bsmt-apt llc, 1st bsmt-apt from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
P
Pamela Equities Corp
3.9(85)
Corporate Owner•
22 Properties•1678 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 16
S
Sanjay Chauhan
3.9(76)
Officer•
15 Properties•1499 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
P
Pam Am Equities, Inc
3.7(8)
Agent•
1 Property•70 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 3
A
Angel Arno
3.7(8)
Site Manager•
1 Property•70 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 3
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (8)
3.62 stars
4 months ago
Heat and A/C often not working
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location and units have high ceilings and big windows. The apartments feature modern and clean finishes.
Cons:
Heating was very low sometimes. There was a few times it dropped below 15 celsius in the winter. The A/C was also not working and I asked the super and they replaced an used unit for me and it was still not cooling anything at all, just fan.
Advice to owner:
Make sure the heat and A/C units work
4.12 stars
9 months ago
Review of 304 E 20th
Former Tenant
Pros:
- Can't hear neighbors at all (good sound proofing) - Common areas generally clean - Super and management generally responsive - Rent decreased!
Cons:
- Washing machines leak / laundry room sometimes unclean
1.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
If I could give them zero stars, I would.
Former Tenant
Pros:
The area. Can't think of a pro of the actual building.
Cons:
Visibly saw four rats in the basement. Heard them in the walls for MONTHS. "Landlord" doesn't respond to emails, calls, inquiries, questions, concerns, anything. They simply just don't respond.
4.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Quiet, upscale post war building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Quiet, clean, great location
Cons:
Not rent stabilized, renewal was up ~30%
Advice to owner:
No advice at this time
5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Perfect Building in Gramercy!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Super clean, very responsive super, lots of young couples and dogs
Cons:
The package system is a bit of a mess- all packages just get thrown into a closet so it takes a lot of time to sort through everyone’s packages to find yours
Advice to owner:
A better package situation would elevate the experience
4 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good location, that's about it.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location and proximity
Cons:
Unresponsive management, next to a school, super is ok.
Advice to owner:
Listen to your tenants!
3.62 stars
Over 3 years ago
Nice renovated building, poor management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building has great sunlight given the location near playgrounds. Apartments have beautiful finishes and modern appliances.
Cons:
Super constantly changes and some of them are very unresponsive. I had AC problems, heating problems and it took forever to resolve those. There were even days there’s no running water. The leasing office is also very unresponsive.
2.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
So many mice
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good covid deal when I signed my lease. There’s a convenient app instead of keys. Pet friendly (Ish). Angel is a great super.
Cons:
Caught at least ten mice and saw them in unspeakable places. Building is doing the bare minimum to help. Basement is unbearably hot in the winter because the laundry room isn’t vented correctly (87 degrees when your AC isn’t on). Dead roaches around. Screaming child occasionally present in basement. Water doesn’t taste right after the last time they had to turn it off.
Advice to owner:
Maybe scrap some basement units and turn it into a gym as this isn’t very livable.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here