200 Central Park South,Manhattan, NY 10019
309 Units
•Built in 1963
•35 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 200 Central Park South
Midtown
200 Central Park South #18D
$10,221
1 bed•1 bath•Est. Feb 2025
Future
Midtown
200 Central Park South #8G
$9,124
1 bed•2 baths•Est. Mar 2025
Future
Midtown
200 Central Park South #14/15l
$12,445
2 beds•2 baths•Est. Apr 2025
Future
Midtown
200 Central Park South #26A
$20,616
2 beds•2 baths•Est. Jun 2025
Future
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
3
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
May 10, 2023: § 27-2046.1 hmc: repair or replace the carbon monoxide detecting device(s). missing in the entire apartment located at apt 16d, 16th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
1
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 22, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
P
Parvez Ahmed
4(17)
Site Manager•
Officer•
18 Properties•2476 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 22
P
Park South Tenants Corporation
3.9(3)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•499 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
D
Desi Ndreu
3.9(3)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•421 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
C
Chris Cafiero
3.9(3)
Site Manager•
Officer•
2 Properties•421 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
3.62 stars
Over 1 year ago
Is the location worth it?
Former Tenant
Pros:
The staff is really nice and the common areas are well taken care of. We loved the location but often questioned why we didnt move a block or two away and get a far superior apartment and building for the same money.
Cons:
Owners in the building can have out of control dogs and generally be awful neighbors in any way they choose (noise, smoke, etc) with zero consequences from the building manager (who’s pretty awful. His assistant mgr is nice tho.) The quality of the apartment itself is pretty mid range (at best) - the high rent is for the location. They turn the ac on way too late and off way too early in the seasons so plan to spend a few months out of the year really uncomfortable. There’s no thermostat to speak of so you get nuclear level heat or nothing in the winter. There seem to be a lot of water and mold problems and construction noise is CONSTANT.
Advice to owner:
Agree with the other reviewer - why waste your time.
4.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Excellent apartment if you can afford it
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice doormen, many amenities, close to Central Park, clean and quiet apartment with lots of natural light
Cons:
Strict on move in and out times, difficult to get things repaired, some neighbors are not very friendly
3.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
You are paying for the location - don’t expect much more than that
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building manager is awful, but otherwise the staff is friendly. Hallways have been nicely redone. And the location is great. Hot water supply is good.
Cons:
A Spitzer family trust (yes, that Spitzer family) owns like 70 units in this co-op. So they can rent them out as “sponsor units.” As one of their renters living among gagillionaires you’ll spend most of your time being treated like a second class citizen by the building manager and being ignored by the Spitzers’ property managers at “Rose Associates.” Seriously, this is the most money you will ever spend to have the absolute minimum - low end appliances, half-assed repairs and renovations, terrible responsiveness etc, etc. The bigger issue though is the mold and water problems - the building is riddled with both. I had mold
leeching through the walls in various areas and many instances of water damage - after weeks of emails you might finally get a response and they just come paint over the mold or the water damage spot. No remediation or real solution. Which kind of describes how the building infrastructure has been treated as a whole over the years and left them with these problems. Desperately needed repairs are painted over or left til so much damage has been done that they can’t ignore them anymore. As a result the whole place is continually in some phase of massively loud construction and has that weird damp old building smell. For more than two years there it was loud, nonstop construction noise - and pretty constant respiratory problems. If you’ve got asthma or allergies, or kids who sleep during the day, or you work at home or do shift work and need to sleep during the day - this is NOT the place for you.
leeching through the walls in various areas and many instances of water damage - after weeks of emails you might finally get a response and they just come paint over the mold or the water damage spot. No remediation or real solution. Which kind of describes how the building infrastructure has been treated as a whole over the years and left them with these problems. Desperately needed repairs are painted over or left til so much damage has been done that they can’t ignore them anymore. As a result the whole place is continually in some phase of massively loud construction and has that weird damp old building smell. For more than two years there it was loud, nonstop construction noise - and pretty constant respiratory problems. If you’ve got asthma or allergies, or kids who sleep during the day, or you work at home or do shift work and need to sleep during the day - this is NOT the place for you.
Advice to owner:
Yeah, this would probably be wasting my breath. They are what they are and they don’t give a single S. Just know what you are getting yourself into if you rent there.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here