366 West 52 Street,Manhattan, NY 10019
15 Units
•Built in 1920
•5 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 5
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
11 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 day ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
2.26 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
10
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Feb 08, 2019: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair the broken or defective window balance to lower sash in the 1st room from north located at apt 1b, 1st story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Hazardous
17
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 22, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak at ceiling in the bathroom located at apt 1b, 1st story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
7
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 22, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of roaches in the entire apartment located at apt 1b, 1st story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
O
366 Operating LLC
3.2(9)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•41 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
R
Robert Chou
2.2(5)
Agent•
1 Property•15 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 5
K
Katherine Chou
2.8(33)
Head Officer•
11 Properties•158 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 13
E
Empire Condominium
2.8(26)
Corporate Owner•
10 Properties•129 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 12
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
2 stars
1 month ago
Going down hill
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location and layout.
Cons:
No locks on mailboxes. Packages constantly stolen. Poor building management and negligence. Landlord doesn’t take immediate attention to problems in building. Constant leaks from sink and apartments from above leading to water damage. Hole in the hallway ceiling that has never been repaired properly.
Needs to be cleaner too. Roaches are a consistent problem.
Needs to be cleaner too. Roaches are a consistent problem.
Advice to owner:
Needs better attention to immediate repairs in building and better contact. Mailboxes should be locked!
2.38 stars
Over 1 year ago
Poorly Managed Building
Former Tenant
Pros:
This building close to where my roommates and I work, and we liked the location at the time. The price was also reasonable when we signed the lease.
Cons:
The bedrooms are very small, there is little space for storage, the bathroom (tub & shower) has been painted over, and the kitchen is VERY tight (it's not even a kitchen, more like a hallway).
We also had a few issues contacting the landlord, and at times he was very rude to us.
We also had a few issues contacting the landlord, and at times he was very rude to us.
2.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
not terrible but not good
Former Tenant
Pros:
neighbors were quiet
good location
good location
Cons:
very loud street even from the 5th floor
landlord hard to reach, didn’t fix our problems
turns out this is a rent controlled building and we were not made aware of that! overcharged in rent for 2 years
landlord hard to reach, didn’t fix our problems
turns out this is a rent controlled building and we were not made aware of that! overcharged in rent for 2 years
2.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
0/10 recommend this building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Apartment is in good location.
Cons:
Terrible communication with landlord, only by phone and he does not answer outside of business hours or on weekends.
No super.
Apartment is falling apart.
Heat did not work for most of winter.
We went multiple days without hot water.
No super.
Apartment is falling apart.
Heat did not work for most of winter.
We went multiple days without hot water.
Advice to owner:
Use email or an online platform.
Better communicate with tenants.
Better communicate with tenants.
1.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Avoid like the plague
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location was the only pro.
Cons:
Abysmal responsiveness from the property manager. He had no email and would seldom answer phone calls.
Not 1, not 2, but 3 holes in the ceiling throughout my unit from water damage that continually got worse. We brought it up to the landlord several times and he refused to get it fixed.
Illegally raised the rent. The apartment is not rent-controlled however by the law we were entitled to a 60-day notice which we did not receive before he raised it over the legal 5%.
Not 1, not 2, but 3 holes in the ceiling throughout my unit from water damage that continually got worse. We brought it up to the landlord several times and he refused to get it fixed.
Illegally raised the rent. The apartment is not rent-controlled however by the law we were entitled to a 60-day notice which we did not receive before he raised it over the legal 5%.
Advice to owner:
Learn how to be a property owner/manager.