451 West 44 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10036

35 Units

Built in 1910

6 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Unknown
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
17 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.37 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
24
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Apr 01, 2024: (a) § hmc:file annual bedbug report in accordance with hpd rule as described on the back of this notice of violation or as described on hpds website, www.nyc.gov\hpd, search bed bugs.
Show all
flag
Hazardous
16
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Apr 08, 2022: § 27-2056.7 and 27-2056.17 adm code -certify compliance with lead-based paint hazard control requirements during period of unit vacancy by submitting required supporting documentation and affidavits for apartment located at apt 1, 1st story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
6
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Apr 01, 2022: § 27-2056.7 adm code: correct failure to provide to the department within 45 days of demand all records required to be maintained by owner pursuant to local law 1 of 2004 related to lead-based paint notices, inspections and remediation/abatement activities.
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
2
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
Nov 15, 2023: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
O
O T S Realty Corp
3.6(2)
Owner
Corporate Owner
Agent
2 Properties52 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
L
Lei Ong
3.6(2)
Shareholder
Officer
Head Officer
2 Properties52 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
O
O W T Rlty Corp
3.6(2)
Owner
Corporate Owner
Agent
2 Properties52 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
J
Jaime Pabon
3.6(2)
Site Manager
1 Property35 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

Over 1 year ago
Affordable and quiet. Management responds to issues pretty quickly
Former Tenant
Pros:
Lived here for three years. Unit was facing inner courtyard and was very quiet. Rent was reasonable. Installed security cameras after receiving security complaints. The building is close to everything midtown can offer. Pretty safe neighborhood.
Cons:
They’re was some rodent issue before I moved out. Which is very common in old buildings like this. There was leaking from ceiling. But the roof was repaired within a week. Overall pretty decent management quality at this price.
Advice to owner:
Keep up the good work Improve the aging building parts
Over 2 years ago
Overall positive experience for a low price
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice intercom system, minimal pests during my three years there, lots of windows, overall decent apartment for the price
Cons:
Non-responsive management company, hallways not taken care of
Advice to owner:
It should be more clear who to reach out to for repairs, questions about the lease, problems, etc. and the landlord should be more responsive regarding lease renewals and move out questions