426 West 47 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10036

15 Units

Built in 1901

5 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
16 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.26 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
1
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jun 15, 2018: § 27-2005 hmc: post, in a form approved by the commissioner, and maintain a notice in a common area of the building regarding the procedures that should be followed when a gas leak is suspected at public hall, 1st story
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
3
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Feb 14, 2015: § 27-2005 adm code & 309 m/d law abate the nuisance consisting of hot water not to exceed 130 degrees. in the kitchen located at apt 1b, 1st story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
J
Jon Rahimzada
3.1(45)
Officer
9 Properties121 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
N
Nejat Realty LLC
3.1(48)
Owner
Corporate Owner
10 Properties139 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
Z
Zada West LLC
3(17)
Owner
Corporate Owner
2 Properties35 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
D
Danny Rahimzada
3.1(26)
Head Officer
5 Properties66 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (9)

1 month ago
Not a good experience.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good restaurants nearby. Citibike dock down the street. No pet fee.
Cons:
Constantly dirty inside and outside of the building (trash piling up outside, trash/dirt on stairs). They lied on the tours/open house and said that there was roof access (there is no roof access). Washing machines/dryers in the building left my clothes with powdery lint so I had to use a nearby laundromat. Maintenance requests are slow to answer and the repairs are not very good (our sink was leaking twice in one year because they didn’t do a good job). Road noise and yelling is an everyday occurrence between 12-3am most nights if your bedroom faces the street. Landlord tried to illegally withhold our security deposit.
6 months ago
Bad maintenance good kitchen
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cheap rent, cute street, big kitchen/ bathroom
Cons:
Rat and bug infested, wonky steep stairs, dirty
Advice to owner:
Get the exterminator and tent the building
6 months ago
426 w 47th
Former Tenant
Pros:
the kitchen and bathroom seem to be newlyish renovated, but not well.
The apartment is quiet
Cons:
I don’t even know who the landlord is, and if they live on site. They aren’t responsive anyways.
The entrance area and stairs are never clean.
The building floors and stairs are uneven.
When a maintenance issue arises, are needs are not met- a quick fix is applied rather than an actual solution.
Sometimes they shut off the water without warning for hours and never give us notice/explanation.
Advice to owner:
Be nicer and more available to your tenant. Clean the lobby and common areas on each floor. Get better laundry machines.
Over 1 year ago
It’s decent apartment/building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice location
Near subways (1,CE,NWR)
Cons:
Mice in ceiling
Leaking
Washer and dryer is expensive in building
Over 1 year ago
Nice neighborhood, very responsive owners
Former Tenant
Pros:
Peaceful yet in the middle of the action, surrounded by restaurants, delis, liquor stores and Duane Reade, etc.
Owner is very responsive and always a pleasure to deal with.
Cons:
No elevator, which can be challenging sometimes.
Advice to owner:
Apartments can use some renovation.
Over 2 years ago
Decent building but has issues
Former Tenant
Pros:
- true 2 BR with separate livingroom
- good fridge
- closets have space
- good water pressure in shower
Cons:
- broker fee
- no doorman
- no elevator
- ugly views
- little/no sunlight
- water pressure in bathroom sink is low
- pest issue (mice/cockroaches)
- exterminator did not arrive when they said they would
- little counter space
- could not control heat (often got too hot)
- AC is dirty (all repairs/management have to be handled by tenant)
- any AC purchased belongs to apartment owner
Advice to owner:
Fix the cons:

- broker fee
- no doorman
- no elevator
- ugly views
- little/no sunlight
- water pressure in bathroom sink is low
- pest issue (mice/cockroaches)
- exterminator did not arrive when they said they would
- little counter space
- could not control heat (often got too hot)
- AC is dirty (all repairs/management have to be handled by tenant)
- any AC purchased belongs to apartment owner
Over 2 years ago
It was okay for the price point and location.
Former Tenant
Pros:
It’s a fine place to live
Cons:
We had roaches for the first couple months in our apartment. The building provided us with an exterminator.
Over 2 years ago
Avoid at all costs
Former Tenant
Pros:
Neighbors were quiet and respectful.
Cons:
A mirror and closet were both broken when we moved in. The apartment was in poor condition and dirty when we moved in, which contributed to the reasons we did not renew the lease. Management also ignored us when we were having issues with our lock, which resulted in us having to pay $500 out of pocket to replace. After days of negotiation with them, we came to the agreement that they would deduct $100 from our rent that month, something they also failed to do. Additionally, the lock on the front door of the building didn’t work well. My packages were stolen on multiple occasions, an unwelcome scammer posing as a Con-Ed employee easily entered our building as was going door to door, and there was once a person sleeping in the front hallway. When I tried to notify management about this, they didn’t get back to me. I never felt safe in this apartment.
Advice to owner:
Do better. Don’t advertise a 3 bedroom apartment when it is really a two bedroom. Take care of your space and respect your tenants.
Over 2 years ago
Hope for best
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, and access to rooftop
Cons:
Garbage is overflowing, Extermintor comes or not, you can only hope he will. Problem with small bugs and mice.