A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.48 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
8
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jun 17, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the ceiling in the 2nd room from north located at apt 1i, 1st story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Hazardous
23
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jul 08, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color the ceiling and all walls in the kitchen located at apt 1i, 1st story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
8
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 08, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 1i, 1st story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
W
427 West 51 St Owners Cp
3.9(2)
Owner•
1 Property•80 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
L
Labe Twerski
2.8(39)
Shareholder•
Agent•
Head Officer•
63 Properties•3955 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 265
W
427 W 51 Street.owners Corp
3.9(2)
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•80 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 9
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (2)
3.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Party neighbor & poor response
Former Tenant
Pros:
Affordable price, elevator is nice, laundry in basement is nice
Cons:
Load radiator, poor respond from super, party neighbor
4.5 stars
Over 3 years ago
6 months—Good So Far
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is wonderful, elevator is such a luxury to me, good laundry machines in basement, much easier to receive packages that don’t get stolen. My apartment is much quieter than most other places I’ve lived.
Cons:
Apartment was newly renovated but they screwed up some things. Fridge door can’t open fully. Bathroom door won’t stay shut. Door buzzer seems to work about half the time. Super isn’t super responsive to requests for fixes.
Advice to owner:
Fix the door buzzers.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here