Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 hour ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
L
Longview Property Services LLC
3.2(49)
Agent•
29 Properties•464 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 11
U
Uvi Holdings LLC
3.2(41)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
17 Properties•277 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 7
H
Hector Adame
3.6(4)
Site Manager•
1 Property•10 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 1
P
Peter Hungerford
2.9(32)
Head Officer•
11 Properties•157 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
3 stars
6 months ago
Definition of Mediocre
Former Tenant
Pros:
- not too noisy - SPACIOUS bedrooms - updated enough appliances
Cons:
- cockroaches everywhere in the stairs and apartments - weak water pressure - landlord rarely gets back to you // not in a timely manner - packages get stolen daily
Advice to owner:
I left due to rent increases that were unjustifiable for the space it was. Please seriously invest in a cleaning service to clean up not just the first floor, but all the stairs and doors of the tenants as well.
3.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
Don’t live here!
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location, price, location
Cons:
Management impossible to reach. Building is dirty. Bad neighbors with loud animals.
3.12 stars
Over 1 year ago
Same old New York
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location, in Hell’s Kitchen and close to the subway. Diagonally across the street to a small park and around the corner from restaurants and bars, great if you are a night owl.
Cons:
Mice in the building, exterminators stopped coming routinely at the beginning of the new year. Management company is consistently unresponsive. Kids from the high school down the street would come into the entryway everyday Monday through Friday at all times of the school day/afternoon and smoke weed, filling up the hallways and apartments with smoke smell.
Advice to owner:
Take better care of the building and your tenants’ quality of life.
4.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
Undervalued Apartment building
Former Tenant
Pros:
I don’t know what the rent prices are now for 406 W 56th but this was the first apartment I lived in and it was really great. If the landlord is still making you pay by physically dropping off the check yes that’s annoying, but trust me - there are way worse apartments in the city. This building truly was clean, had no pests, and was a large enough living space. I’m now in a terrible dirty apartment that is more expensive. The super is OK, he’s a typical super. But it’s unique to find an apt with no problems really, and that was this one.
Cons:
N/A, a little more water pressure would have been nice
Advice to owner:
Please start accepting digital payments, for the rent!