160 West 73 Street,Manhattan, NY 10023
146 Units
•Built in 1929
•14 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: Yes
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 160 West 73 Street
Upper West Side
160 West 73 Street #14C
$4,504
Studio•1 bath•Est. Apr 2025
Future
Upper West Side
160 West 73 Street #9H
$3,927
Studio•1 bath•Est. Feb 2025
Future
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
411 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
Less than 0.01 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
1
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jul 27, 2019: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... at north wall (approximately 10 sq.ft) in the 3rd room from east at north located at apt 14d, 14th story, 1st apartment from south at west
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
Ephraim Alish
3.7(5)
Site Manager•
1 Property•146 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
M
Michael Gaffney
3.7(5)
Agent•
1 Property•146 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Allan Goldman
3.5(183)
Head Officer•
140 Properties•4078 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 65
E
Est. Of L. Goldman & Lillian Goldman Family L.l.c.
3.6(17)
Corporate Owner•
4 Properties•398 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
4.62 stars
9 months ago
Nice building staff, quiet apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
Quiet apartment, nice building staff
Cons:
Most washers and dryers in laundry room don’t work, cockroaches in unit (but responsive management to help), yellow mold
Advice to owner:
Repair laundry
4 stars
11 months ago
Stay away from this building
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location is idyllic and the doormen are wonderful.
Cons:
The main cons are the super who is difficult/checked out and the management who are challenging to reach.
I found things looked fancy in the apartment, but were cheap, shoddily made. The sink was tilted so water pooled around it. There was mold growing on the ceiling in our bathroom. There were some windows that didn’t close properly.
I found things looked fancy in the apartment, but were cheap, shoddily made. The sink was tilted so water pooled around it. There was mold growing on the ceiling in our bathroom. There were some windows that didn’t close properly.
Advice to owner:
Prioritize quality and hire new super
4.12 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great apartments, frustrating managment
Former Tenant
Pros:
The units are beautiful. Most are very large with tons of windows, renovated kitchens / bathrooms and very thick floors and walls for sound insulation. The doormen are all great, and the building is generally well maintained. I’ve seen a cockroach or two, but for the most part there haven’t been any issues with pests.
Cons:
There are only three washing machines for a building of 100+ apartments, which makes laundry difficult. Multiple washing machines in the laundry room have been broken for years and it does not seem like the building management plans on fixing them. The building is run by a large management company who is very difficult to get in touch with. The few times I’ve had to communicate with them they have been unresponsive and rude. They also seem to consistently raise the rent by large amounts year to year.
3.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
Rough around the edges
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good sunlight. Great sound isolation. Good location. Nice staff.
Cons:
Albert, one of the property managers is very difficult to work with and gets very nasty for no reason. The rest of the people who work at the property management firm seem ok.
Only three laundry machines to the entire building, which often break, and almost always require a wait to use, and are expensive.
Some units are very dated and require renovation. The plaster peels off the walls, kitchens are cramped.
Only three laundry machines to the entire building, which often break, and almost always require a wait to use, and are expensive.
Some units are very dated and require renovation. The plaster peels off the walls, kitchens are cramped.
Advice to owner:
Get rid of Albert. He doesn’t seem like that bright a bulb and is unnecessarily nasty towards tenants. There are so more new people coming into the building these days and we need more laundry capacity.
2.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Great building - Poorly maintained
Former Tenant
Pros:
The building is a former music school as I understand and so the walls and ceilings are basically soundproof. The many tenants have been there for many, many years and are in rent-subsidized / stabilized units and everyone is very nice. The staff is also very nice.
Cons:
The units are rodent-infested. I personally caught 5 small mice in my unit and had to seal up the cracks myself. Laundry machines limited and are often broken and not repaired timely. Hot water is often an issue and not available in the building. Water is constantly being turned off for one reason or another. Ceiling often leaks due to water running down the front of buildings into cracks (been told by super).
Advice to owner:
Improve the maintenance of your building and stop raising rents when the conditions so poor.