A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 3 weeks ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Immediately hazardous
0
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
W
63 West Realty Corp
3.3(63)
Agent•
Corporate Owner•
6 Properties•376 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
W
63 West Realty Corpetc
3.2(9)
Owner•
1 Property•47 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
C
Charles Kirshner
3.4(19)
Head Officer•
2 Properties•96 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (9)
4 stars
2 months ago
awful for the price, but nice area
Former Tenant
Pros:
While I was living there, they installed a security system for the front door to buzz yourself in with a code/face ID or to buzz people in remotely from your phone. That was pretty nice, because previously all they had were keys. The area is great, if you’re not worried about living near the projects. Really liked living in a nice area of Manhattan AND close to John Jay for school. Live in super was very responsive.
Cons:
Rooms are CRAZY small. Laundry rooms were often not cleanly. When I first moved there, had a REALLY hard time with mice — once I got a cat the issue lessened. Roaches continued to be an issue, even though we kept the apartment clean. We were paying 2800$ in covid pricing for what was technically a 2 bedroom apartment, where the living room was axed to create a third bedroom. They then jacked up the rent to $3500, with little improvement to the space. Appliances were OLD and very small. I’m 5 foot 3 and I could see the top of the fridge without standing on my tippy toes. Ovens were crazy small — so forget about baking anything larger than a tin of brownies or some cookies. When we left, they tried to raise the rent to $3650. Can’t imagine what they’re charging for it now!
Advice to owner:
If you’re going to jack up the rent, maybe add some newer appliances to the space. Or upgrade the bathroom!
3.88 stars
6 months ago
Decent first NYC apartment
Former Tenant
Pros:
We did not have roaches in our apartment!
Cons:
Every few months, the elevator would break. The dishwasher was old and really loud, be sure you check the appliances before you move in!
3 stars
Over 1 year ago
Exactly What You'd Expect With Low Budget
Former Tenant
Pros:
Located in an excellent neighborhood. More affordable than most other apartments in the area. There's a gym in the apartment. Very fast to make repairs. Great place for students.
Cons:
Limited washing machine and dryers, and one of the units is almost always not working. The space for a studio is incredibly small, but that's the trade off.
3.75 stars
Over 1 year ago
Very dirty, inconvenient
Former Tenant
Pros:
I appreciated the decently sized room I had.
Cons:
We had a huge issue with insects. Also our appliances not working or breaking very easily. We eventually had them replaced relatively quickly though.
3.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
247 West 63rd
Former Tenant
Pros:
Laundry in-building Gym Virtual doorman Quick with maintenance requests
Cons:
The heat could’ve worked a bit better this winter
3.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Not bad, def mid
Former Tenant
Pros:
It has some good amenities (gym, multiple laundry room, an office, facial recognition doors), the management is pretty responsive.
Cons:
The tenants are mostly students and can be super loud, things break a good amount and it takes forever for them to be replaced.
Advice to owner:
Reward your good tenants. Fix stuff faster instead of spending money on stuff no one asked for, get better security.
3.12 stars
Over 2 years ago
You get what you pay for.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Cheap relative to the area. Management is responsive and making an effort, have always addressed maintenance concerns - they were shoveling sidewalks, are kind. Noise between bedrooms in units is minimal. Packages are well-taken care of.
Cons:
Laundry machines are aging and gross. Location is POOR - feel unsafe walking home at night, a hike to the subway, nothing around re: restaurants/groceries/quick bites to eat. Everything at least 15 minute walk. You can hear your neighbors from living room/hallways and they can hear you - super thin walls. Newly remodeled units are poorly remodeled - things are falling apart that are brand new, quality of finishes is poor. Looks great at first and then falls apart. Apartment was FILTHY when we moved in and was missing basic components - toilet lid, kitchen faucet, etc.
Advice to owner:
Be more responsive to general upkeep/proactive re: laundry facilities, noise complaints, etc.
2.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
Dirty and Overpriced
Former Tenant
Pros:
Even though the studio is overpriced, $1690/m, it’s cheaper than most other apartments in the Lincoln Center are
Cons:
Very dirty. Whenever it rains, the apartment ceiling leaks. Cockroaches. Very small space. Either too hot or too cold.
1.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
It’s not worth it!
Former Tenant
Pros:
The only pro is the friendly front desk staff
Cons:
Wish I could give this place a minus! Unresponsive and koi management. Never trust anything they tell you, make sure to always have it in writing. They will also ghost you heavily.
There is a recycling station, but I caught the porters throwing all of the recycled items down the general trash. When confronting them, they said it’ll end up in the same container anyways.
Building is poorly managed. Cockroaches and water bugs could lie dead in the hallways for weeks. I would wake up at night hearing either mice or rats climbing inside of the walls. Walls are thin and neighbors below and across had drug/alcohol problems. A lot of arguments, slamming doors and mistakenly taking my apartment door for their own and tried to get in several times.
Advice to owner:
Get your shit together, and hire responsive, service-minded staff. It’s really not pleasant speaking with a staff that pushes everything away.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here