491 Columbus Avenue,
Manhattan, NY 10024

17 Units

Built in 1892

5 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
71 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 6 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.23 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Hazardous
0
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 05, 2024: § 27-2029 adm code provide an adequate supply of heat for the apartment in the entire apartment located at apt 2n, 2nd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
W
5 West 95th Street
3.1(171)
Corporate Owner
140 Properties1791 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 24
J
John Brusco
3.1(94)
Head Officer
66 Properties871 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 17
Z
Zacarias Vazquez
3.1(154)
Agent
123 Properties1566 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 18
C
491 Columbus Ave LLC
2.3(4)
Corporate Owner
2 Properties27 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (4)

Over 1 year ago
Where do I start
Former Tenant
Pros:
-Location
-Nothing else
Cons:
-Very dirty and poor garbage maintenance (leads to a smell in the lobby/stairs that has made me gag)
-Pests (cockroaches and the building has a history of bed bugs)
-Management company is unresponsive and doesn’t seem to care (Shoutout to Celsa for reinforcing the stereotypes about NYC slumlords)
-Problematic tenants (If your mail is stolen/covered in dog pee or your wondering why the police are there every week or so, thank the second floor tenants)
-Cannot have packages delivered (Children, some of which live in the building, will steal them)
Advice to owner:
Take a hard look in the mirror and reflect on the living conditions you subject your tenants to. How would you feel if your landlord treated you the same way?
Over 1 year ago
reviewing this building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Management is responsive to requests for repairs.
Cons:
Should mop hallways more frequently.
Over 2 years ago
Do not rent from Brusco Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
The best thing I can say about the building is that it is in a decent neighborhood. There are things to do, solid places to eat at, at least one good bar nearby, etc. This is all irrelevant during Covid tho.
Cons:
This is going to get long, but if you're even thinking about renting here, please read:
1. Essentially, there is no super. I was given multiple numbers during my few years in the building, and never once did I have actual contact with the super. During literal emergencies (like the boilerroom catching fire) it took hours for the super to appear, after multiple calls to multiple numbers.
2. Management is AWFUL. The building caught fire, and the first thing the Brusco brothers, who own the building said to me, after I told them that multiple fire alarms throughout the building DO NOT WORK, was 'we aren't sorry because this wasn't our fault. Also is your door damaged'.
3. Packages CONSTANTLY get stolen, and it's for a number of reasons. The two doors to access the building are usually broken and provide no security. In addition, there are zero cameras in the entrance hallway where literally anybody walking by the building can see dozens of packages piled up. Also I suspect the few employees who take out the trash occasionally steal packages they see have sat there for a few days. There is zero security in this building, it's embarassing.
4. Management does not care about it's tenants, and purposely has antiquated systems in place to ensure that you, as a tenant, get screwed at every turn. You have to physically deliver or mail your rent checks monthly, and they have hilariously lost rent checks or claimed to receive them late, and so they'll tack on a late fee. There is zero reason to not have an online payment alternative.
5. The restaurant next door, which this management company also owns that property, has a messed up ventilation system. LOUD fans constantly whirring all day, and pretty bad smells filling apartments, are the standard. I made friends with neighbors and one said the restaurant had to physically go through their apartment MANY times to access their ventilation equipment. Meaning strangers were constantly going inside their apartment and climbing out the windows to access a small rooftop with broken ventilation machinery. This happened before and during Covid.
6. The building is not maintained--it's dirty and often stinks. Somebody once let their dog take a dump in the lobby hallway and it stayed there for two weeks.
Advice to owner:
My advice is to look at the way you manage these apartments, read the reviews on Yelp and Google and listen to what tenants are telling you. You're doing an awful job, it's not up for debate, but hiring a responsible super who tenants can actually contact; implementing real security measures like working front doors and lobby cameras; and not acting like slum lords would go a long way.
Over 2 years ago
Cute apt, great location, but horrible maintenance
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is perfect

Cons:
Roaches, water leak,
unresponsive landlord
Advice to owner:
Get a super who is responsive and knows how to fix things