Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.15 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
2
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Feb 24, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at ceiling in the 2nd room from north at east located at apt 9c, 9th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Hazardous
2
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jul 06, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color ceilng in the 1st room from east at south located at apt 9c, 9th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Immediately hazardous
5
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Jul 06, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 9c, 9th story, 1st apartment from east at south
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
R
Ray Plasencia
1.9(1)
Site Manager•
1 Property•60 Units
Litigation History: No
Evictions: 0
W
40 West 86th Street LLC
2.4(8)
Owner•
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•220 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
W
William Rudin
3.6(33)
Head Officer•
18 Properties•2473 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 8
R
Rudin Management CO
3.6(33)
Owner•
17 Properties•2412 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 7
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (1)
1.88 stars
Over 1 year ago
Poor Managment / No amenities
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location and the apartments have a lot of light.
Cons:
1. Poor management company Rudin, with extremely inadequate communication and a laissez-faire attitude toward tenant issues. There's zero accountability; it takes over two weeks to get a new vendor approved, and they discriminate against small businesses. They don't invest in fixing the building; instead, they just put band-aids on everything.
2. There's no insulation between apartments, so you can literally hear every step taken and every word spoken by your upstairs neighbors. The management company fails to correct this issue and enforce the 80% rug coverage as per the lease.
3. Rusty water stains everything: the tub, sink, and toilet.
4. The elevator breaks multiple times each month and is by far the slowest elevator.
5. The laundry room closes, so you can only do laundry at certain hours, which is very inconvenient.
Advice to owner:
Hire someone with expertise in managing business operations and establishing efficient, repeatable processes. Implement technology to enhance efficiency and improve the user experience. Avoid implementing quick fixes like the Alfred app, as it can further isolate processes and hinder effective communication. Do something for the building tenants, as the perceived value of your buildings is only deteriorating, and so is your reputation.