114 West 86 Street,Manhattan, NY 10024
49 Units
•Built in 1928
•16 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 114 West 86 Street
Upper West Side
114 West 86 Street #17C
$4,495
1 bed•1 bath•Avail. Immediately
Upper West Side
114 West 86 Street #4C
$4,537
1 bed•1 bath•Est. Jan 2025
Future
Upper West Side
114 West 86 Street #10C
$4,944
1 bed•1 bath•Est. Mar 2025
Future
Upper West Side
114 West 86 Street #2A
$7,452
2 beds•2 baths•Est. Apr 2025
Future
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 16 hours ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.63 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
9
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Nov 07, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department the ceiling at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
16
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Nov 07, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardant material at ceiling at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Immediately hazardous
6
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Nov 25, 2024: hmc adm code: § 27-2017.4 abate the infestation consisting of rodents rats, at east court yard
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
F
Fidan Gecaj
3(4)
Site Manager•
1 Property•49 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
G
Gene Palumbo
3.4(288)
Corporate Owner•
216 Properties•4826 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 83
A
Aj Clarke Re Corp
3.6(65)
Agent•
49 Properties•1014 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 18
M
Magdalena Kosz
3.3(18)
Head Officer•
10 Properties•255 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
2.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
No good management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good neighbors only
Cons:
Lots of issues. Management not responsive. Neighbors had no gas for a very long time. Some have Rodents and heat problems as well.
Advice to owner:
Not applicable as there will not be any improvement
2.38 stars
Over 2 years ago
Horrible landlord & no building care for what could be a lovely residence.
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location is unbeatable, as are the neighbors.
Cons:
Sadly, the building is horribly maintained: inconsistent water and heat alongside a lack of building and delivered package safety. There are also MAJOR structural issues with the pipes, causing individual apartment and building-wide emergencies. Outside of a garbage basement with many rats, the laundry room is insufficient for the amount of tenants and the machines themselves are filthy. (those machines were also inoperable for almost a year due to the water pipe issues!)
Advice to owner:
The landlord, Robert Gilardian, is dismissive at best. Had the building been properly maintained, it could have been a premier destination. Instead, tenants live from an at least bi-weekly issues and overall impending doom (breaking water pipes, leaks, crumbling walls and ceilings). The scaffolding - which has been up for nearly 15 years - is itself an emblem of the disregard.
3.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Is the location and space worth the hassles?
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, wonderful neighbors, roomy apartments.
Cons:
Scaffolding (aka shed) has been up for over a decade. Physical plant (facade, heat, elevator, etc.) not well maintained.
Advice to owner:
It could be a true luxury building, which given the location should be worth a great deal, but investment is required.
3.38 stars
Over 3 years ago
Nice apartments on not so well managed building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Elevator building, laundry on building
Cons:
Unresponsive management
Basement dumpster with pest issues
No cooking gas In some apartments since 3 months ago
Basement dumpster with pest issues
No cooking gas In some apartments since 3 months ago
Advice to owner:
The building is great, if only management company would put more effort and really work on the building, it would be a much better place to live
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here