202 West 82 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10024

30 Units

Built in 1920

5 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
126 complaints
Get rental reports for more information
You Will Get:
call-center
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
rat
The latest rodent inspection reports.
construction
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Duration in the past 10 years.
Data last updated 2 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
3.03 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
25
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Jul 08, 2024: § 300 m/d law file plans and application and legalize the following alteration or restore to the legal condition existing prior to the making of said alteration walls erected with studs and wood panels from floor to 2 feet below ceiling with a door opening creating additional room in the 1st room from north located at apt 5a, 5th story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Hazardous
53
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Aug 22, 2024: § 27-2026, 2027 hmc: properly repair the source and abate the evidence of a water leak behind east wall in the 5th room from north located at apt 5a, 5th story, 2nd apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
13
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Aug 22, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective latchset at compactor closet door at public hall, 5th story
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
Magdalena Kosz
3.1(2)
Head Officer
2 Properties52 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
A
Arnesa Cekic
3.1(2)
Officer
1 Property30 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
F
Frank Brusco
3.1(2)
Site Manager
1 Property30 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
G
Gene Palumbo
0(0)
Head Officer
216 Properties4826 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 75
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (2)

10 months ago
Management is Awful
Former Tenant
Pros:
Decent amount of space and great neighborhood
Cons:
Super is useless. It seems like he can’t do anything without permission from the property manager. The property manager is apathetic and incompetent. Getting anything fixed is like pulling teeth.
Advice to owner:
Actually fix stuff when I ask.
11 months ago
Solid building to live in improved with new super
Former Tenant
Pros:
Pretty quiet building with friendly people.
Cons:
Precious super was really poor and there were issues with mice and roaches and general cleanliness. The condition of the place has improved under the new super.