NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
All Upper West Side
/
Upper West Side
/
251 West 92 Street
Upper West Side

251 West 92 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10025

86 Units

•

Built in 1925

•

12 Floors

2.4(5)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 7
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Available Listings In 251 West 92 Street
    unit
    Upper West Side
    251 West 92 Street #10-E
    $9,817
    5 beds•3 baths•Est. Jan 2025
    Future
    unit
    Upper West Side
    251 West 92 Street #5A1
    $2,962
    1 bed•1 bath•Est. Jan 2025
    Future
    unit
    Upper West Side
    251 West 92 Street #5A2
    $2,962
    1 bed•1 bath•Est. Jan 2025
    Future
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 4 days ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    1.04 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    12
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 20, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling at public hall, 11th story
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    44
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 20, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code properly repair with similar material the broken or defective fire retardant material at ceiling at public hall, 11th story
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    34
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Oct 07, 2024: § 27-2056.7, 27-2056.8, 27-2056.9 adm code -certify compliance with lead-based paint hazard control requirements during period of unit vacancy by performing activities necessary to abate tested lead-based paint from required window and/or door friction surfaces for apartment and make floors smooth and cleanable, positive lead-based paint in an apartment with a child under six located at apt 8e, 8th story, 1st apartment from north at east
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    S
    Sam Taverez
    2.4(5)
    Site Manager•
    1 Property•86 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 6
    A
    Adam Goodstein
    2.4(5)
    Head Officer•
    1 Property•86 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    W
    West 92nd Street Associates LLC
    2.4(5)
    Corporate Owner•
    1 Property•86 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 6
    D
    David Eisenstein
    2.4(5)
    Agent•
    1 Property•86 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (5)

    7 months ago
    Overall nice building
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Never saw a bug. The building seemed to be very clean and well-maintained
    Cons:
    It was loud and very hot in the summer (apartment did not have AC)
    Over 2 years ago
    Nice neighborhood, good area
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Good atmosphere, safe
    Cons:
    Landlord, lack of responsiveness to issues
    Advice to owner:
    Be more attentive
    Over 3 years ago
    Building in trouble
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Location is great
    Cons:
    No super and no maintenance person. No one is in charge. Owners are old sick and have left the building to rot.
    Advice to owner:
    Hire a super and a management company.
    Over 3 years ago
    Good location, neighborhood
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Nice lobby, large apts
    Cons:
    Infested with bedbugs, mice, rats. Very poorly maintained.
    Advice to owner:
    Sell the building to a good manager
    Over 3 years ago
    Absolute Worst
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Nice neighbors and great location convenient to park, restaurants and stores. Building staff is extremely limited but friendly and decent.
    Cons:
    Landlord is a criminal. Has a duct tape mentality to repair and the building is totally unsafe. He has countless violations. We had bed bugs infested from a neighbor downstairs and he never told us. Paul Bagoni and his wife are nasty and should not be managing any properties at all. The basement and laundry room are filthy. He is being sued by multiple tenants.
    Advice to owner:
    Sell the building and retire.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here