251 West 92 Street,Manhattan, NY 10025
86 Units
•Built in 1925
•12 Floors
•Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 6
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: No
Building Overview
Building Report
Available Listings In 251 West 92 Street
Upper West Side
251 West 92 Street #10-E
$9,817
5 beds•3 baths•Est. Jan 2025
Future
Upper West Side
251 West 92 Street #5A1
$2,962
1 bed•1 bath•Est. Jan 2025
Future
Upper West Side
251 West 92 Street #5A2
$2,962
1 bed•1 bath•Est. Jan 2025
Future
Hey smart renter!
In the past three years, this building had:
487 complaints
Get building reports for more information
You Will Get:
Building complaint and pricing history broken down by month.
The latest rodent inspection reports.
Existing or upcoming construction projects in the building and area.
And more...
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 4 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
1.02 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
11
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 11, 2024: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling in the 4th room from north located at apt 2e1, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
Hazardous
43
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 11, 2024: § 27-2045 adm code repair or replace the smoke detector defective in the entire apartment located at apt 2e1, 2nd story, 2nd apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
34
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 07, 2024: § 27-2056.7, 27-2056.8, 27-2056.9 adm code -certify compliance with lead-based paint hazard control requirements during period of unit vacancy by performing activities necessary to abate tested lead-based paint from required window and/or door friction surfaces for apartment and make floors smooth and cleanable, positive lead-based paint in an apartment with a child under six located at apt 8e, 8th story, 1st apartment from north at east
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
S
Sam Taverez
2.4(5)
Site Manager•
1 Property•86 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
A
Adam Goodstein
2.4(5)
Head Officer•
1 Property•86 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
W
West 92nd Street Associates LLC
2.4(5)
Corporate Owner•
1 Property•86 UnitsLitigation History: Yes
Evictions: 6
D
David Eisenstein
2.4(5)
Agent•
1 Property•86 UnitsLitigation History: No
Evictions: 0
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (5)
4.5 stars
6 months ago
Overall nice building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Never saw a bug. The building seemed to be very clean and well-maintained
Cons:
It was loud and very hot in the summer (apartment did not have AC)
2 stars
Over 2 years ago
Nice neighborhood, good area
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good atmosphere, safe
Cons:
Landlord, lack of responsiveness to issues
Advice to owner:
Be more attentive
1.62 stars
Over 2 years ago
Building in trouble
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location is great
Cons:
No super and no maintenance person. No one is in charge. Owners are old sick and have left the building to rot.
Advice to owner:
Hire a super and a management company.
1.75 stars
Over 2 years ago
Good location, neighborhood
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice lobby, large apts
Cons:
Infested with bedbugs, mice, rats. Very poorly maintained.
Advice to owner:
Sell the building to a good manager
1.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
Absolute Worst
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice neighbors and great location convenient to park, restaurants and stores. Building staff is extremely limited but friendly and decent.
Cons:
Landlord is a criminal. Has a duct tape mentality to repair and the building is totally unsafe. He has countless violations. We had bed bugs infested from a neighbor downstairs and he never told us. Paul Bagoni and his wife are nasty and should not be managing any properties at all. The basement and laundry room are filthy. He is being sued by multiple tenants.
Advice to owner:
Sell the building and retire.