A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.22 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
0
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Hazardous
2
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Oct 11, 2017: § 27-2018 admin. code: abate the nuisance consisting of mice in the entire apartment located at apt 3c, 3rd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Immediately hazardous
2
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Mar 30, 2018: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system sign missing at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
East 53rd Holdings LLC
3.4(5)
Corporate Owner•
3 Properties•57 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
D
Darek Rudnik
3(4)
Site Manager•
1 Property•18 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
E
231-235 East 53 Street LLC
3.2(34)
Corporate Owner•
14 Properties•572 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
R
Robert Kalimian
2.9(25)
Head Officer•
10 Properties•404 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (4)
3.25 stars
Over 1 year ago
Could be much better
Former Tenant
Pros:
Location: decent restaurants, very close to subway, relatively safe
Cons:
Noisy corporate tenants on ground level, superintendent is good but owners are terrible, halfway house on block, laundry facilities are below par, trash area is disgusting.
Advice to owner:
Energy efficiency, kick out insomnia cookies, clean the space between the apartments, clean the stoops.
2 stars
Over 1 year ago
Great Units, Horrible Management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Units are large, painted bright white, nice hardwood floors. Semi-updated bathrooms. Multiple windows allowing for a lot of natural light. Street is full of restaurants, safe to live on.
Cons:
Management is horrendous.
Mice constantly in 5th floor walk up. Super avoided solving the mice problem, I decided to call an exterminator, and management wouldn’t pay for it. Turned against me and said I violated my lease. Ignored my phone calls and emails. Same thing happened again when I needed my locks changed/fixed. Called a locksmith and they refused reimbursement. Again calls and emails were ignored. Ended up filing with the small claims court since they were unwilling to settle things.
Super is hit or miss with solving problems in a timely manner. Was able to get a new stove quickly after my original one stopped working. However it took over 6 months to get a simple door sweep installed (which wasn’t there upon move in, and attributed to the mice issue).
Advice to owner:
Hire better management, overall, do better.
4.5 stars
Over 1 year ago
No real complaints
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good value and attentive super
Cons:
Pretty much a no thrills building but to be expected at the proce
2.25 stars
Over 2 years ago
Old walkup building
Former Tenant
Pros:
No bugs in apartment
Cons:
Noise from neighbors and old appliances
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here