350 East 52 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10022

137 Units

Built in 1962

15 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 1 week ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.56 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
16
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Dec 04, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color wall inside sink base cabinet in the kitchen located at apt 12j, 12th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Hazardous
47
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Dec 02, 2024: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at ceiling in the kitchen located at apt 12j, 12th story, 2nd apartment from north at east
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
15
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 26, 2024: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc, §238, § 309; § 107 (2) ( c) mdl and 28 rcny §25-171: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective hinges in the entrance located at apt 10b, 10th story, 3rd apartment from east at south
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
A
Admir Haxhiu
3.2(14)
Site Manager
1 Property137 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
E
Eastgate Whitehouse LLC
2.9(16)
Lessee
Corporate Owner
2 Properties146 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
P
Prospect Greenwood LLC
3.2(27)
Shareholder
Head Officer
6 Properties210 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 4
L
Livingston Management Services LLC
3(148)
Agent
161 Properties2943 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 134
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (14)

6 months ago
350 E 52
Former Tenant
Pros:
The older doormen and the porters are wonderful. They are responsive, helpful, and friendly.

The apartments are a good size and clean.
Cons:
The heat is controlled by the building and the apartments turn into an ice box in the winter.

The younger doormen don’t seem to care about doing their jobs.
7 months ago
Great place to live
Former Tenant
Pros:
Affordable, convenient, clean
Cons:
Smaller bedrooms than around the neighbourhood
10 months ago
Great place to live overall
Former Tenant
Pros:
The doorman are always nice and friendly. The elevator is always working, trash is always managed.
Cons:
The super is lazy and unresponsive. He does a sloppy job at fixing things and has no sense of urgency. Some things are outdated
11 months ago
Terrible building owner
Former Tenant
Pros:
Staff is great and works really hard with what they have to keep the place as nice as possible. Large floor plans especially for studios. Very dog friendly.
Cons:
No response when you submit work orders. Trash compactor keeps breaking leading to trash management issues. Laundry is $8/load. Heat is inconsistent.
Over 1 year ago
Nice building poor management
Former Tenant
Pros:
Nice location, good neighborhood
Cons:
Owner is bad, super is unresponsive,
Over 1 year ago
Good experience overall
Former Tenant
Pros:
Clean building, wonderful doormen
Cons:
Had some issues with neighbors
Over 1 year ago
Don't get involved!
Former Tenant
Pros:
The neighbors are great and so is the location.
Cons:
The landlord is one of the cruelest and litigious con men in NY. Building is in foreclosure, landlord claimed bankruptcy multiple times, is suing his own mother and being sued by many other people. The gaslighting is endless and he gets away with breaking laws andruining lives. Stay away
Advice to owner:
Try speaking one true sentence. Just once.
Over 2 years ago
Mice infested and creepy neighbors
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location, close to train.
Cons:
I lived here for a year and could not get the radiator to heat my bedroom. The super came to take a look at it multiple times and nothing was ever wrong with it, however the room was always freezing.

The neighbors are psychotic and also creepy.

The apartment was infested with multiple mice and the exterminators were not successful in getting rid of them. If you’re willing to live along side with mice, this is the spot for you.

The laundry machine washed my white linen with dirty brown water and everything turned yellow. Management didn’t take responsibility and the laundry machine company Hercules didn’t take responsibility. Machines consistently are my money. Don’t do your laundry in the building.

They raised the prices $1400 in a year and the listing agent told us we had to pay the broker free to stay here.

The doormen don’t open doors except for 1 or 2. The super is so rude. The turnover of supers in this building is wild though.
Advice to owner:
Pay your handymen and staff correctly. Maybe they’ll become more friendly, helpful and actually do their jobs.
Over 2 years ago
Current renter, tenant for three years.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Great location, classic pre-war city building, concrete walls so barely hear neighbors and they don’t hear me.
Cons:
Terrible owners who don’t maintain the building, currently in current lawsuit as owner was overcharging rent stabilized apartments and major class action lawsuit that they lost. Consequently, they hike up the rent price every year in tenants like me who are in rent stabilized apartment. Owners care more about short term renters rather than long-term renters.
Advice to owner:
Why do you let such a nice building become dilapidated and neglected? You seem to care more about making quick money than providing decent housing for people at a reasonable rates Without outrageously hyping up rent prices every year.
Over 2 years ago
Mgmt ignores smokers. Jacks up rent as high as possible
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doormen nice but have lost packages they signed for.
Cons:
Be aware you are sharing with many rent stabilized tenants. Some like the person whose apt opens onto a communal roof, openly violate rules like smoking on the roof and leaving personal furniture there making you feel like an intruder for using communal property. They will raise your rent 50 or 75% if they believe they can get it they have zero concerns about tenant retention and won’t negotiate.
Advice to owner:
The smoking tenant on roof needs to move his personal furniture off roof and stop intimidating other tenants. Management should consider quality if tenants instead of bilkimg them for every last buck by raising rents in run down building. That money clearly doesn’t go to hard working porters who are only paid minimum wage.
Over 3 years ago
Okay building but landlord gouges you upon renewal
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good building for post college. Lived here for 2 years 1 year in a 2 bedroom and 1 in 4 bedroom. The apartments and appliances are dated but it was good enough for a bunch of guys recently out of college. Doormen are amazing and the roof is nice for small gatherings.
Cons:
The landlord is a little sketchy and apparently has pending litigation. Our original rent was normal but then he tried to raise it 15% on renewal and wouldn’t budge. There was no reason for the raise either, just greed. If you sign a lease, don’t expect to be able to afford the renewal.
Advice to owner:
If you’re going to raise rents by 15% year over year, at least show some improvements in the condition of the building. The lobby, elevators, hallways and apartments look like they’re out of the 60s. This could be any amazing building to live in with some TLC.
Over 3 years ago
Fake Nice Building
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good location, fairly spacious apartments, has elevator and doorman, friendly staff
Cons:
Owner is unreasonable, maintenance requests get ignored, elevators consistently break, doormen are often missing late at night or under the influence, everything is dated/old in common areas. Ownership is not accommodative of requests or reasonable.
Advice to owner:
There’s a reason tenants have a class action lawsuit against the owner of the building… the building could be nice if he cared, but he’s more interested in lining his pockets than putting any updates into the building.
Over 3 years ago
Not as advertised
Former Tenant
Pros:
Doormen are nice, there is an elevator
Cons:
The smell of the hallway, the apartment was left filthy and was not informed that there was mold
Over 3 years ago
Greedy landlords will jack up rent 50 percent
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good space in apts
Cons:
Super greedy landlord raised rent 50 percent after one year. Maintenance never comes to fix things. Despite their greed, staff is paid minimum wage. Creepy tenant lives on communal roof acts like it’s his personal space (he’s allowed to keep his furniture on communal roof that no one can use). Always has slider open spying on anyone who uses roof.
Advice to owner:
Roof tenant should not keep personal furniture on communal roof. No smoking on roof. If you keep jacking up rent 50 percent you are only going to get disloyal tenants
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here