NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
Midtown East
/
Sutton Place
/
400 East 58 Street
Sutton Place

400 East 58 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10022

126 Units

•

Built in 1929

•

16 Floors

4.1(5)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 2
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Yes
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Available Listings In 400 East 58 Street
    unit
    Sutton Place
    400 East 58 Street #009C
    $6,000
    1 bed•1 bath•Est. Feb 2025
    Future
    unit
    Sutton Place
    400 East 58 Street #001E
    $5,330
    1 bed•1 bath•Est. Apr 2025
    Future
    unit
    Sutton Place
    400 East 58 Street #002K
    $5,208
    1 bed•1 bath•Est. Apr 2025
    Future
    unit
    Sutton Place
    400 East 58 Street #9C
    $6,044
    1 bed•1 bath•Est. Jun 2025
    Future
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 2 weeks ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.4 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    15
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    May 22, 2019: § 27-2005 adm code refit fire rated door in the entrance located at apt 7a, 7th story, 6th apartment from east at south
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    35
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    Sep 29, 2024: § 27-2005 hmc: properly repair or replace the broken or defective electrical light fixtures at ceiling, stair case# a. at public hall stairs, 5th story
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    1
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Apr 05, 2019: § 27-2017.3 hmc: trace and repair the source and abate the visible mold condition... at ceiling approx 14 sq ft ( master bathroom) in the 1st bathroom from east located at apt 7a, 7th story, 2nd apartment from east at south original violation 12883688 issued 30-jan-19 has been upgraded to class c per administrative code ''27-2017.3a(5)(a) or (b).
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    0
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    A
    Adam Grushko
    4.1(5)
    Officer•
    1 Property•126 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    M
    Margaret Brunn
    4.2(10)
    Head Officer•
    2 Properties•241 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    E
    400 East 58th Street, LLC
    4.1(5)
    Owner•
    Corporate Owner•
    1 Property•126 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    R
    Richard Cohen
    4.2(10)
    Head Officer•
    2 Properties•241 Units
    Litigation History: Yes
    Evictions: 2
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (5)

    10 months ago
    Good experience, but over priced
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Responsive and helpful management. The doormen are so nice!
    Cons:
    Significant rent increases each year with lease renewal which is what eventually caused me to leave, otherwise I would have stayed for many years. They seem to keep units open and not listed on the market for a long time to control demand. My newly renovated unit has not been relisted since I moved out 6 months ago and is sitting empty.
    Over 1 year ago
    Reliable, well-kept building
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Amazing doormen! A package of mine got lost and they spent days looking for it until it was found! Called other buildings etc. They never miss a beat!

    Clean laundry room! Always able to get a machine.

    Very thick walls. I have never heard a neighbor above of below.

    When anything needed fixing, the super came within hours.
    Cons:
    Can’t think of anything I don’t like.
    Over 1 year ago
    My favorite apartment yet
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    The building is clean, quiet, and the doormen are the best. The super was very responsive any time I needed help.
    Cons:
    I wish there was outdoor space or some common areas!
    Over 3 years ago
    Super is $$$ hungry
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Large old pre war building
    Cons:
    Superintendent nickel and dimes you. Overcharges you for everything you need done in your apartment. Building management also does not return your phone calls or emails.
    Advice to owner:
    Get it together! To many other nice units on the market to not care.
    Over 3 years ago
    Look Elsewhere
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Building staff is incredible, super kind and friendly, always very responsive to concerns they can address.

    Walls are solid concrete so you can’t hear anyone else.
    Cons:
    We were promised lounge and gym access at an adjacent building that was subsequently denied, agreed to 18 month lease but were actually given a 19 month one (our fault for not counting but didn’t expect that to happen), absolutely no flexibility on rent or lease during the pandemic, have numerous apartment issues that seemingly can’t be fixed (constant toilet clogging, faulty doorbell, breakers tripping, pipe leak in wall that caused wall to be broken down multiple times).
    Advice to owner:
    Offering flexible rent would have likely kept far more tenants, make your prices more competitive with the rest of the market, offer even a single amenity, don’t allow people to represent you who don’t actually know your terms and conditions.
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here