A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from
NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311.
The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed
as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 5 days ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.95 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
Non-hazardous
5
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Oct 05, 2021: § 27-2005, 2007 adm code remove device preventing door from being self-closing ; the door check at entrance door to building and vestibule door at public hall, 1st story
Show all
Hazardous
12
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jun 24, 2024: § 27-2010, 2011, 2012 adm code remove the accumulation of refuse and/or rubbish and maintain in a clean condition the garbage at building front yard
Show all
Immediately hazardous
4
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Oct 05, 2021: § 27-2005, 27-2007, 27-2041.1 hmc: replace or repair the self-closing doors that is missing or defective in the entrance located at apt 3a, 3rd story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
M
My So Llc,jewel Group Assoc Llc, E74 St Assoc LLC
3.2(3)
Corporate Owner•
2 Properties•44 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
M
My So LLC
3.2(3)
Owner•
1 Property•22 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
S
Sazan Metaj
3.2(3)
Site Manager•
1 Property•22 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 0
B
Ben Ohebshalom
3.5(23)
Shareholder•
Head Officer•
11 Properties•196 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Renter Q&A
Be the first to ask a question!
Building Ratings
Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure
Renter Recommendations
--% of renters recommend this building
--% of renters approve of this owner
Rents and Deposits
-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.
Reviews (3)
3.5 stars
Over 2 years ago
Quaint Building that needs updating
Former Tenant
Pros:
- Great Location - Reasonably sized bedrooms - Rooftop space
Cons:
- Super at the time did not care to fix things - A few mice in building - Unable to control heat (it got hot!) - Needs updating
Advice to owner:
Update appliances and bathrooms. Fix holes that are causing mice to enter/exit
2.88 stars
Over 2 years ago
Could be so great
Former Tenant
Pros:
Pre-war walkup with super-high ceilings, tall windows, hardwood floors, and great built-in storage. Decent-sized kitchen (for a studio) Good transport links on a quiet block
Cons:
The landlord does not seem to care about maintaining what could be a gorgeous gem of a building. The front doors are falling apart, the communal laundry machines break constantly. The the communal “roof deck” is super tiny (the majority of the roof is considered a private roof deck for the penthouse) and the furniture has been broken since the day I moved in. Management does not clean communal areas and it is a battle to get any maintenance requests completed. Cockroaches are a problem in the summer. Any sound from the stairwell echos into the units so while you don’t hear much noise at all between units/floors, it’s incredibly loud if anything happens in the hallway (typically a problem when rowdy guests yell going up and down the stairs as most of the tenants are in their 20s); “renovations” are clearly done as cheaply as possible (the tiles in my shower are the same as the ones in the lobby and were not installed with waterproof materials so the porous grout falls out in chunks); they raise rents as high as the market allows and don’t seem to care about constant tenant turnover
Advice to owner:
Take care of your building and stop price-gouging tenants
3.12 stars
Over 3 years ago
232 e 74th
Former Tenant
Pros:
The location and transportation
Cons:
The condition of my apartment when they are advertised as “renovated.” Also, the kitchen is absurdly small.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here