230 East 79 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10075

107 Units

Built in 1964

19 Floors

Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Evictions: 1
Litigation History: Yes
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
Open Violations
A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
Only open violations from the last 10 years.
Data last updated 2 hours ago.
BUILDING AVERAGE:
0.38 violations per unit
NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
0.81 violation per unit
flag
Non-hazardous
7
class A
i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
MOST RECENT:
Aug 22, 2020: § 27-2013 adm code paint with light colored paint to the satisfaction of this department at ceiling and all walls in the bathroom located at apt 5d, 5th story, 1st apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Hazardous
28
class B
i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
MOST RECENT:
Jun 15, 2023: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color at ceiling in the 1st room from north located at apt 5d, 3rd story, 3rd apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Immediately hazardous
6
class C
i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
MOST RECENT:
Sep 16, 2021: § 27-2005 adm code repair the broken or defective plastered surfaces and paint in a uniform color east wall( approx. 60 sq ft) and south wall(approx. 60 sq ft) in the kitchen located at apt 5d, 5th story, 3rd apartment from west at north
Show all
flag
Missing information/filings
0
class I
Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
MOST RECENT:
No violation found...
Show all
Property Owners and Associates
E
239 East 79 Owners Corp
3.8(10)
Corporate Owner
15 Properties766 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 2
K
Karen Nadel
2.8(7)
Head Officer
2 Properties315 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
L
Luis Ortiz
2.8(7)
Site Manager
1 Property107 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
G
Genie Gavenchak
2.8(7)
Head Officer
3 Properties352 Units
Litigation History: Yes
Evictions: 1
Frequently Asked Questions

Renter Q&A

ask-question
Be the first to ask a question!

Building Ratings

Cleanliness
1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
Garbage Management
1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
Heat
1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
Neighbors
1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
Noise Levels
1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
Owner Responsiveness
1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
Pest Control
1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
Water Pressure
1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Cleanliness
Garbage Management
Heat
Neighbors
Noise Levels
Owner Responsiveness
Pest Control
Water Pressure

Renter Recommendations

--% of renters recommend this building

--% of renters approve of this owner

Rents and Deposits

-- of renters received their security deposits back
It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

Reviews (7)

Over 1 year ago
Just don’t do it
Former Tenant
Pros:
Good water pressure when it works and it’s not brown.
Friendly doormen when they’re there.
Elevators when they’re not broken.
Cons:
Poor pest and bug control. Building constantly smells like stale urine (this is common knowledge amongst staff). The monopoly owner is borderline slumlord that doesn’t care and only employs family members (Google the family, it’s public knowledge). The heat and AC are always down and owner claims repairs are being done when they aren’t (don’t be fooled by heat and AC included). Water is shut down for 12 hours every other month for “cleaning.” Elevators are often broken. TLDR: avoid.
Advice to owner:
Be human and respect your tenants
Over 1 year ago
The most confusing building in NYC
Former Tenant
Pros:
Dean! He is the best part of the building.
Cons:
I rent, but very confused about how/why the HOA could ever be this high - there are no amenities, elevators don't work well, the super is not responsive, and the doormen are kind but they do not announce guests/ let anyone in.
Over 1 year ago
Overpriced, terrible everything, just don’t.
Former Tenant
Pros:
Dean (maintenance guy) is amazing, great guy and very helpful.
Water pressure is great
Cons:
- The elevators don’t work, which I guess is great if you’re into cardio
- Our floor constantly smells terrible to a point we’re embarrassed to have people over
- The washing machines and dryers randomly stop working so every round of laundry ends up taking 3-4 hours with between 3-5 visits to the laundry room.
- The doormen (except for one) just lay on the couch all day (we just call them “couchmen”)
- This dude on the 7th floor brought in a DRUM KIT, refused to stop playing it for weeks
- During the winter days, at least twice a week the HEAT BROKE, I work from home so I would sit indoors wearing a coat.
- Around once every two-three weeks the water break as well for 8-10 hours, good luck using the bathroom (theres a nice one on starbucks two blocks away)
- The rent is ridiculous, the maintenance fees are extremely high, I believe this is some money laundering scheme especially considering the above.
Advice to owner:
Sell it, but I doubt anyone would buy it for even 60% of the current price
Over 1 year ago
Deceptively Nice Looking
Former Tenant
Pros:
Wide array of headline features, like a doorman, elevator, laundry room, central heating/cooling, etc.
Cons:
Poorly maintained building; regular heating/cooling outages, outdated bathrooms, dirty water from pipes, elevators regularly have issues, the list goes on... Few of these issues are apparent during an apartment viewing but become apparents a month after move in.
Advice to owner:
Fix your building instead of sending flyers asking if the tenants want a gym
Over 2 years ago
so excited to move in
Former Tenant
Pros:
huge apartment. Its on 79 Street! Porters are excellent! Friendly staff.
Cons:
things were always breaking down. Elevator, heat, ac units didn't work properly especially in the bedroom. The rent increases were crazy!
Its a co-op but I was renting a sponsor unit.
Over 3 years ago
Pretty good place
Former Tenant
Pros:
Laundry in building
New kitchen
Location
Cons:
Bad management and landlord
AC is built in but barely works
Hard to get something fixed
Over 3 years ago
Live somewhere else
Former Tenant
Pros:
The only good thing about this building is the free air conditioning and that you can control your heat too.
Cons:
The building is rundown, the elevators are extremely old and break, the building needs many repairs that they do not do. There are cockroaches (we had to tape some of our outlets to stop this). The hot water is unreliable sometimes. While the AC is free it does break occasionally (2-3 times per summer for a few days at a time). The owner of the building and staff are difficult to deal with. In the rentals they don’t put a coating over the hardwood floor so the wood finish comes up if you try to clean it with water or any liquid. There were 3-5 months this summer where they didn’t upkeep the mailboxes appropriately and the USPS refused to deliver so we had to go down to the post office to pick up our mail.
Advice to owner:
Maintain this building appropriately, it isn’t fair to the people who live here.
Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
OR
Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here