NYC Buildings
/
Manhattan
/
Upper East Side
/
Lenox Hill
/
342 East 65 Street
Lenox Hill

342 East 65 Street,
Manhattan, NY 10065

20 Units

•

Built in 1910

•

5 Floors

4.5(4)
Rent Stabilized Units: Yes
Good Cause Eviction: Yes
Evictions: 0
Litigation History: No
1 Year Bedbug History: No
Pet Friendly: Unknown
Building Overview
Building Report
    Do you own or manage this building?
    Open Violations
    A violation is issued to a building when a city inspector from NYC's Department of Housing Preservation and Development validates and confirms a complaint made to 311. The violations listed below are open violations that have yet to be addressed or have not been confirmed as resolved by the city.
    Only open violations from the last 10 years.
    Data last updated 1 week ago.
    BUILDING AVERAGE:
    0.1 violations per unit
    NEW YORK CITY AVERAGE:
    0.81 violation per unit
    flag
    Non-hazardous
    0
    class A
    i.e. no peephole on a door, or no street # on the building, unlawful keeping of animals
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Hazardous
    0
    class B
    i.e. smoke detector issues, inadequate lighting, no lighting for stairways
    MOST RECENT:
    No violation found...
    Show all
    flag
    Immediately hazardous
    1
    class C
    i.e. rodents, pest, mold, inadequate heat or hot water, defective building parts
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 09, 2021: § 27-2033 adm code post notice, in form approved by the department, stating the name and location of the person designated by the owner to have key to buildings heating system incorrect information on signage at public hall, 1st story
    Show all
    flag
    Missing information/filings
    1
    class I
    Missing or non-compliant with administrative information orders or filings
    MOST RECENT:
    Nov 22, 2024: §27-2107 adm code owner failed to file a valid registration statement with the department as required by adm code §27-2097 and is therefore subject to civil penalties, prohibited from certifying violations, and denied the right to recover possession of premises for nonpayment of rent until a valid registration statement is filed.
    Show all
    Property Owners and Associates
    L
    Lana Chemis
    4.5(4)
    Officer•
    1 Property•20 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    N
    Nathan Chelmis
    4.5(4)
    Site Manager•
    Head Officer•
    1 Property•20 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    S
    Spider City LLC
    4.5(4)
    Agent•
    Corporate Owner•
    1 Property•20 Units
    Litigation History: No
    Evictions: 0
    Frequently Asked Questions

    Renter Q&A

    ask-question
    Be the first to ask a question!

    Building Ratings

    Cleanliness
    1 (unmanaged) to 5 (well managed)
    Garbage Management
    1 (poorly managed) to 5 (well organized)
    Heat
    1 (faulty) to 5 (working)
    Neighbors
    1 (loud / disrespectful) to 5 (friendly and considerate)
    Noise Levels
    1 (loud) to 5 (quiet)
    Owner Responsiveness
    1 (slow) to 5 (timely)
    Pest Control
    1 (lots of pests) to 5 (no pests)
    Water Pressure
    1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
    Cleanliness
    Garbage Management
    Heat
    Neighbors
    Noise Levels
    Owner Responsiveness
    Pest Control
    Water Pressure

    Renter Recommendations

    --% of renters recommend this building

    --% of renters approve of this owner

    Rents and Deposits

    -- of renters received their security deposits back
    It HAS NOT been reported if this building accepts electronic rent payments.

    Reviews (4)

    Over 2 years ago
    not bad at all
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    great and pets
    Cons:
    i didnt love the attitude of the other people living there
    Advice to owner:
    not much, just i guess faster service but still very solid
    Over 2 years ago
    Apt Review
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Management responds promptly when there is an issue.
    Cons:
    Although the response is quick the fixes are make shift and don't last. If the issue is very bad they hire a professional - otherwise it's just the building handyman that takes a look and tries to fix. There were mice from time to time (season to season) in my unit.
    Advice to owner:
    I have not met or communicated with the owner.
    Over 3 years ago
    Alright but could be better
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    Management is generally good and responsive. Reasonable rates. Clean and pest-free.
    Cons:
    Walls are paper thin and you can pretty much hear everything... even the things you don’t want to hear. Heat is not great in the colder months, so space heaters are a must. No laundry, so you’re stuck with the laundromat across the street or wash and fold.
    Advice to owner:
    Add a laundry room
    Over 3 years ago
    Nice & Clean Building w Responsible Management
    Former Tenant
    Pros:
    -Super Clean and Tidy
    -Management very hands on and handles any issues quickly
    -Love the neighborhood
    -Lived here for 5 years and never have seen even 1 roach or pest
    Cons:
    No doorman unfortunately
    Advice to owner:
    Keep up the good work!
    Submit an anonymous review to gain full access to reviews.
    OR
    Don't have a review to share? Subscribe to gain access to the platform.Already have an account?Login Here